Fine, good for him.
Or is there some error in wintertime's science?
Actually, the point is that to wintertime, the science doesn't matter at all. Thus the widespread skepticism he's the "evolutionist" he claims he is.
It's like being someone who claims that election results don't matter to him, but then speaks of his "fellow Republicans"... ...and then calls his "fellow Republicans" names while making conciliatory comments to the Democrats, etc., while never spontaneously promoting or defending Republican positions...
Wouldn't that raise red flags in *your* mind?
Actually, the point is that to wintertime, the science doesn't matter at all. Thus the widespread skepticism he's the "evolutionist" he claims he is.
Along these lines....consider the following statement ...
By forcing children to study evolution and forcing them to associate with those studying evolution, the government is actively undermining the traditions ( with religious consequences) of some while establishing the worldview ( with religious consequences ) of others.
Now if the writer of this statement were to claim he's an 'evolutionist', would anyone believe him? This statament was made by wintertime Here.