[CarolinaGuitarman]

"I do not question the existence of objective reality, nor do I question that certain parts of objective reality are accessible to human reason."

Ok.

"But I do question my capacities as an observer."

Ok.

"You and your evo buddies have it all figured out, and apparently remain convinced in your own minds that you are wholly without biases that would color your interpretation of the evidence."

No, but as I live in a world where I need to make decisions based on imperfect data, I look for methods that will give me the best chance of making the correct decision. That method is science.

"Me? I can look at reality both ways: as a product of intelligent design or as a product of unguided forces of nature."

"You? You're afraid of the idea of an intelligent designer to the point you would invoke the law of the land to see to it that your subjective basis and assumptions reign supreme in the schools."

You have it a%^-backwards. You want the law of the land to recognize your clearly subjective claim (ID).

" I have been taught to despise tyranny of all kinds, and that includes the intellectual tyranny of evolutionary dogma."

Science is not tyranny. Subjective/post-modernism will lead to tyranny though.

[Fester Chugabrew]

You have it a%^-backwards. You want the law of the land to recognize your clearly subjective claim (ID).

I am not the one asking for exclusivity of a philosphy by law. You and your buddies are.