[AmericaUnited]

And little do you know how enormous is the cross-validating evidence and repeatedly validated conclusions of evolutionary biology.

Great, here's your chance back up that statement.

Huge predators would have lurked in Tiktaalik's rivers and lakes,

Oh really?! Where is the ENORMOUS, CROSS-VALIDATED EVIDENSE for this drivel?

"Land had no predators,"

Really? Where is the ENORMOUS, CROSS-VALIDATED EVIDENSE for this drivel?

[RightWingNilla]

Meltdown. Aisle 158.

[Ichneumon]

[And little do you know how enormous is the cross-validating evidence and repeatedly validated conclusions of evolutionary biology.]

Great, here's your chance back up that statement.

Okay.

[Huge predators would have lurked in Tiktaalik's rivers and lakes,]

Oh really?! Where is the ENORMOUS, CROSS-VALIDATED EVIDENSE for this drivel?

Gosh, you mean aside from the vast numbers of large predators fossils found in the Devonian, bite marks found on numerous fossil fish matching the jaws of the fossil predators, fossil predators found with the fossilized remains of their prey in their stomachs, and so on and so on and so on? Oh, but that doesn't count, because you were grossly ignorant of it, right?

This guy was 20 feet long, with a skull four feet wide and bony armor two inches thick -- is that "huge" enough for you?

["Land had no predators,"]

Really? Where is the ENORMOUS, CROSS-VALIDATED EVIDENSE for this drivel?

You mean besides the vast amount of Devonian (and pre-Devonian) land strata which has been examined, all found to be lacking any animals whatsoever larger than a millipede?

Now, it's *your* turn. Provide any actual evidence whatsoever justifying your spittle-flinging rant that these statements are "drivel". We'll wait.