Are you really this stupid? Do you actually believe that there was a time when anyone, anywhere, ever believed that the human body "only has one cell"? Much less in 1859, centuries after the first discovery of the cell?
Clue for the clueless: From the very first moment cells were first discovered, thousands of them were visible in the tiny bit of tissue under that primitive microscope, and their microscopic size was clearly understood. So what kind of moron today would be able to swallow the idiotic notion that anyone back then would ever have been dense enough to say, "hey, I'll bet the human body is only made of one of these microscopic things"...
Oh, wait, you're an anti-evolutionist -- so you're able to believe three transparently idiotic and illogical things before breakfast. Forget I asked.
And to make it clear that Darwin was well aware that bodies are made up of multiple cells:
"We need not here consider how the bodies of some animals first became divided into a series of segments, or how they became divided into right and left sides, with corresponding organs, for such questions are almost beyond investigation. It is, however, probable that some serial structures are the result of cells multiplying by division, entailing the multiplication of the parts developed from such cells."Is being grossly ignorant of science, scientific knowledge, and its history, a *requirement* for being an anti-evolutionist? It sure seems to be.
Charles Darwin, "On the Origin of Species", 1859
I believe in the one-cell theory. Teach the controversy!
When you start your post with: "Are you really this stupid?" I KNOW I have won!!!!
http://www.biology.arizona.edu/cell_bio/tutorials/cells/cells3.html - shows that they thought there was only one or a few cells.