Replies

I argue that the distinction between natural and supernatural is scientifically arbitrary and thus not subject to scientific method.

Fester, I can post a quote where you state that everything is supernatural. At any rate, I'll bite. Please elaborate on your distinction between natural and supernatural, assuming you now maintain there is one.

I think I know the post to which you refer. If you care to find it and call it up I'll address as to whether it accurately reflects my understanding of objective reality. PH saw fit to put it in his list of "Brain on Creationism" quotes, IIRC. I am not at all averse to revising and restating my positions if, as posted, they were ill-written WRT my intentions. Just check the quote and make sure it says I say "Everything is supernatural."

At bottom, science is ill fit to determine whether everything is supernatural or not. Right? Or have you come across the scientific method for determining what is or is not supernatural?