Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newly found species fills evolutionary gap between fish and land animals
EurekAlert (AAAS) ^ | 05 April 2006 | Staff

Posted on 04/05/2006 10:32:31 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

Paleontologists have discovered fossils of a species that provides the missing evolutionary link between fish and the first animals that walked out of water onto land about 375 million years ago. The newly found species, Tiktaalik roseae, has a skull, a neck, ribs and parts of the limbs that are similar to four-legged animals known as tetrapods, as well as fish-like features such as a primitive jaw, fins and scales.

These fossils, found on Ellesmere Island in Arctic Canada, are the most compelling examples yet of an animal that was at the cusp of the fish-tetrapod transition. The new find is described in two related research articles highlighted on the cover of the April 6, 2006, issue of Nature.

"Tiktaalik blurs the boundary between fish and land-living animal both in terms of its anatomy and its way of life," said Neil Shubin, professor and chairman of organismal biology at the University of Chicago and co-leader of the project.

Tiktaalik was a predator with sharp teeth, a crocodile-like head and a flattened body. The well-preserved skeletal material from several specimens, ranging from 4 to 9 feet long, enabled the researchers to study the mosaic pattern of evolutionary change in different parts of the skeleton as fish evolved into land animals.

The high quality of the fossils also allowed the team to examine the joint surfaces on many of the fin bones, concluding that the shoulder, elbow and wrist joints were capable of supporting the body-like limbed animals.

"Human comprehension of the history of life on Earth is taking a major leap forward," said H. Richard Lane, director of sedimentary geology and paleobiology at the National Science Foundation. "These exciting discoveries are providing fossil 'Rosetta Stones' for a deeper understanding of this evolutionary milestone--fish to land-roaming tetrapods."

One of the most important aspects of this discovery is the illumination of the fin-to-limb transition. In a second paper in the journal, the scientists describe in depth how the pectoral fin of the fish serves as the origin of the tetrapod limb.

Embedded in the fin of Tiktaalik are bones that compare to the upper arm, forearm and primitive parts of the hand of land-living animals.

"Most of the major joints of the fin are functional in this fish," Shubin said. "The shoulder, elbow and even parts of the wrist are already there and working in ways similar to the earliest land-living animals."

At the time that Tiktaalik lived, what is now the Canadian Arctic region was part of a landmass that straddled the equator. It had a subtropical climate, much like the Amazon basin today. The species lived in the small streams of this delta system. According to Shubin, the ecological setting in which these animals evolved provided an environment conducive to the transition to life on land.

"We knew that the rocks on Ellesmere Island offered a glimpse into the right time period and the right ancient environments to provide the potential for finding fossils documenting this important evolutionary transition," said Ted Daeschler of the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, a co-leader of the project. "Finding the fossils within this remote, rugged terrain, however, required a lot of time and effort."

The nature of the deposits where the fossils were found and the skeletal structure of Tiktaalik suggests the animal lived in shallow water and perhaps even out of the water for short periods.

"The skeleton of Tiktaalik indicates that it could support its body under the force of gravity whether in very shallow water or on land," said Farish Jenkins, professor of organismic and evolutionary biology at Harvard University and co-author of the papers. "This represents a critical early phase in the evolution of all limbed animals, including humans--albeit a very ancient step."

The new fossils were collected during four summers of exploration in Canada's Nunavut Territory, 600 miles from the North Pole, by paleontologists from the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, the University of Chicago and Harvard University. Although the team has amassed a diverse assemblage of fossil fish, Shubin said, the discovery of these transitional fossils in 2004 was a vindication of their persistence.

The scientists asked the Nunavut people to propose a formal scientific name for the new species. The Elders Council of Nunavut, the Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit, suggested "Tiktaalik" (tic-TAH-lick)--the word in the Inuktikuk language for "a large, shallow water fish."

The scientists worked through the Department of Culture, Language, Elders and Youth in Nunavut to collaborate with the local Inuit communities. All fossils are the property of the people of Nunavut and will be returned to Canada after they are studied.

###

The team depended on the maps of the Geological Survey of Canada. The researchers received permits from the Department of Culture, Language, Elders and Youth of the Government of Nunavut, and logistical support in the form of helicopters and bush planes from Polar Continental Shelf Project of Natural Resources Canada. The National Science Foundation and the National Geographic Society, along with an anonymous donor, also helped fund the project.


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: 375millionyears; coelacanth; crevolist; lungfish; tiktaalik; transitional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,501-1,512 next last
To: NapkinUser
If this is even half as big a discovery as this makes it appear, why are nothing other than small fringe sites carrying it?

Because the fact that evolution occurred is "Dog Bites Man", not "Man Bites Dog". I.E. it's old news.

61 posted on 04/05/2006 11:42:07 AM PDT by narby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
"Hardly anyone will hear about this because it's not that big a story. You won't see constant media coverage to the point of a massive terrorist attack like you would if this was anything big, hell it would be lucky to get a 30-second spot on CNN headline news. It's not a slam against evolution or anything, but it's not a big discovery."

But we WILL hear about who the latest person Paris Hilton did is. When do we ever see more than a 30-sec blurb (if anything) about paleontological finds on the TV?

Your point is... underwhelming.
62 posted on 04/05/2006 11:43:41 AM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("Things are not what they always seem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Is there meaning behind that image?


63 posted on 04/05/2006 11:44:08 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: narby
Because the fact that evolution occurred is "Dog Bites Man", not "Man Bites Dog". I.E. it's old news.

According to the theory, evolution didn't occur, it is continuing...

Though, I don't buy it...

64 posted on 04/05/2006 11:44:11 AM PDT by Zavien Doombringer (The UN 1967 Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
Now you're just lying.

He is not. A law -- now known to be inaccurate -- stating gravity in mathematical terms was defined in the 1600s, while the theory explaining what gravity is was not defined until the early to mid 1900s.
65 posted on 04/05/2006 11:45:45 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio

Darwins Dead?


66 posted on 04/05/2006 11:45:50 AM PDT by Zavien Doombringer (The UN 1967 Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Zavien Doombringer

" According to the theory, evolution didn't occur, it is continuing..."

Actually, according to the theory, evolution occurred, and is still occurring.


67 posted on 04/05/2006 11:46:14 AM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("Things are not what they always seem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
"I wanted to add earlier, but didn't, that this is another case of SLOPPY WRITING. If the spot was on the Equator, then it was TROPICAL, not SUBTROPICAL. And, no, Brazil does not have a SUBTROPICAL climate."

Equatorial proximity does not necessarily eliminate subtropical conditions or vegetation. Think altitude. And Brazil has a subtropical region, along with equatorial, tropical, semiarid, and highland tropical.

68 posted on 04/05/2006 11:46:18 AM PDT by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman

How about, evolution occurs...


69 posted on 04/05/2006 11:47:16 AM PDT by Zavien Doombringer (The UN 1967 Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: yellowdoghunter
Just always good to remind people that evolution is just a theory....:)

What more could it be? No explanation in science rises to any higher level than "theory". I do not understand the purpose of such a reminder.

Or is this a response to creationists who insist that evolution is a worldview, or an attempt to destroy organized religion? If that is the case, then I can understand a "just a theory" reminder, to remind these creationists that evolution is not what they claim that it is.
70 posted on 04/05/2006 11:47:29 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Or, by, for example, recombinant DNA technology.

Evidence exists for viral insertion of genetic information. What evidence do you have for "recombinant DNA technology" as a mechanism for the aquisition of genetic information? Be sure to specify the mechanisms of the technology itself.
71 posted on 04/05/2006 11:49:35 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunkport
So, someone has actually observed something rise from nothing, observed life rise from non-life

The theory of evolution says nothing regarding "something" rising from "nothing", nor does it say anything regarding "life" rising from "non-life". I do not understand why you ask about such observations when they are not relevant to the theory.
72 posted on 04/05/2006 11:51:38 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

Do you have an actual argument involving substance? Thus far you have only appealed to the logical fallacy of ridicule. Laughing at a concept that you do not wish to accept as factual does not invalidate that concept.


73 posted on 04/05/2006 11:52:49 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
More dinosaur hand waving research.

Interesting and noteworthy, but 19th century science in the 21st century must be taken with a grain of salt.

74 posted on 04/05/2006 11:53:11 AM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunkport
This isn't science; it's wishful thinking.

How is it wishful thinking, exactly?
75 posted on 04/05/2006 11:53:33 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunkport; jec41; DaveLoneRanger
So, someone has actually observed something rise from nothing, observed life rise from non-life, observed multi-celled organisms rise from single-celled organisms, observed intelligence rise from non-intelligence? You've got yourself a scoop there, buddy.

You might find that you'll get more out of the conversation, Ken, if you actually know what's under discussion.

You appear to think that "Evolution" is the same as "abiogenesis." They aren't. The ToE has nothing to do with the origin of life, no matter how hard its detractors try to pretend that it does.

76 posted on 04/05/2006 11:53:43 AM PDT by highball (Proud to announce the birth of little Highball, Junior - Feb. 7, 2006!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Zavien Doombringer
Hmmm, so you are hoping that you are a descendant of a fish?

I saw nothing in Strategerist's posting that suggests that he (or she, as the case may be) is "hoping" for anything. Why do you ask such a question?
77 posted on 04/05/2006 11:54:38 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
All these fish are alive today, thus I'm wondering what the significance of this find is.

I am wondering if you read the article. The significance of the finding is more than simply the creature's ability to breathe air.
78 posted on 04/05/2006 11:55:58 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Tiktaalik is just your basic nine-foot Arctic-Equatorial mudskipper with a head like a crocodile.

(It's in the Arctic NOW, YECs. It was near the equator THEN.)

79 posted on 04/05/2006 11:56:08 AM PDT by VadeRetro (I have the updated "Your brain on creationism" on my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
"More dinosaur hand waving research."

What dinosaur? Where does this article talk about dinosaurs?

"Interesting and noteworthy, but 19th century science in the 21st century must be taken with a grain of salt."

As should most anything you say. :)
80 posted on 04/05/2006 11:56:54 AM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman ("Things are not what they always seem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,501-1,512 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson