Not much of Darwin's thinking has been superceded. It's true he didn't know about genetics or DNA, but he wrote extensively about the properties that the inheritable material had to have.
47 posted on 04/05/2006 5:26:50 AM PDT by js1138
(~()):~)>)
'Twas exactly my point; that Darwin's work is on the whole not "passed up", just details fleshed out. As opposed to other disciplines, where entirely new models were brought in wholesale.
Cheers!
49 posted on 04/05/2006 6:12:45 AM PDT by grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)