Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: spunkets
There can only be one theory.

Not only is this statement untrue by virtue of the fact there are thousands of theories, but also by virtue of the fact there are no empirical rules for determining which of two theories capable of interpreting and applying the data is more worthy of certitude.

To infer intelligent design from the presence of organized matter performing a specific function is not "entirely religious." Such an inference does not lead to the establishment of the Roman Catholic Church or even the Christian Church of Organized Matter. It may have religious implications for a good many people, but so what? Is it an absolute necessity for science to discard data just because it might have religious implications? Not if science is going to be objective.

526 posted on 01/26/2006 9:04:47 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies ]


To: Fester Chugabrew
"Not only is this statement untrue by virtue of the fact there are thousands of theories, but also by virtue of the fact there are no empirical rules for determining which of two theories capable of interpreting and applying the data is more worthy of certitude."

You haven't a clue regarding anything in science. You haven't even made it past the first step.

528 posted on 01/26/2006 9:07:44 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 526 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson