Skip to comments.
Machinery Of The 'Marijuana Munchies'
Science Daily ^
| December 26, 2005
Posted on 12/27/2005 7:26:46 AM PST by billorites
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 201-218 next last
To: Know your rights
I can't offhand think of one who hasn't resorted to personal attacks (albeit not all are as low as Clint's). Yeah, just got dismissed as a "newbie lightweight" on our last thread (Mexican gangs forcing locals to grow drugs) by one of FR's leading WODies - but not until he demonstrated the irrelevancy and evasiveness of his arguments. People that understand logic and reason can judge for themselves when perusing older threads.
81
posted on
12/27/2005 8:48:02 AM PST
by
Freedom_no_exceptions
(No actual, intended, or imminent victim = no crime. No exceptions.)
To: 308MBR
Overweight, like much else, is being overmedicalized ... but I'd prefer not to let the morbidly obese die before attaining the necessary willpower.
82
posted on
12/27/2005 8:49:01 AM PST
by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
To: sandbar
This sounds like the liberal attitude toward guns. Is this your take on guns as well? Why are you at Free Republic?Hit a nerve did I?
It's precisely because I am in favor of an individual and healthy 2nd. Amendment that I am not in favor of legalizing pot at this time. The rise in crimes of public violence and assassinations began with Kennedy signing the Community Mental Health Centers Act of 1963 that let the mentally ill out on the street. The rise of drug abuse, crime and violence was a result.
ALL of the notorious cases of gun violence in this country, since the Sixties, have been committed by the mentally ill being able to wander the streets of this country. These mentally ill also drove the increase in drug abuse. The mentally ill are the reason that the 2nd Amendment is being infringed. Or is that too high a concept to wrap your drug addled brain around?
So shove your, "Why are you here?" where it belongs, you friggin ignorant moron!
83
posted on
12/27/2005 8:49:33 AM PST
by
elbucko
To: Freedom_no_exceptions
People that understand logic and reason can judge for themselves when perusing older threads.I agree ... but it never hurts to highlight WODdies' lack of logic and reason.
84
posted on
12/27/2005 8:50:19 AM PST
by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
To: 308MBR
re: getting off your dead butt for some exercise and pushing away from the table before you feel full
Hey, you don't have to get personal here.
85
posted on
12/27/2005 8:50:50 AM PST
by
jwpjr
To: elbucko
"However those who are severely mentally ill do not do well on marijuana. As I've posted before, when society has a handle on the mentally ill, even if it's only re-institutionalizing them, I might agree to a limited use of pot. But if you think I am going to concede to anyone being able to cruise on down to the 7-11 for a pack of nugs, you're wrong. Take another hit, man."
I guarantee you that mentally ill people would be worse on alcohol or caffeine but I don't see liquor stores doing psychiatric screenings.
There is absolutely no good argument why marijuana is illegal but alcohol/tobacco isn't. Except, of course, for the fact that it would be difficult to tax.
86
posted on
12/27/2005 8:51:05 AM PST
by
varyouga
(I no longer fear death. I only fear the day when the DUmmies take over.)
To: Know your rights
Ah,,got ya, thanks.
Just an aside, my unscientific survey of these deep thinkers indicates about a 98% user rate among these posters. Most claim they don't do it anymore. None volunteers to report to jail to begin their payment to society for the exact crime they advocate others be jailed for.
Hypocrisy seems to go hand in hand with posting childish comments.
87
posted on
12/27/2005 8:51:44 AM PST
by
Protagoras
(If jumping to conclusions was an Olympic event, FR would be the training facility.)
To: Know your rights; elbucko
never hurts to highlight WODdies' lack of logic and reason. They usually do a good job of that themselves. Like post 83 above.
88
posted on
12/27/2005 8:54:00 AM PST
by
Freedom_no_exceptions
(No actual, intended, or imminent victim = no crime. No exceptions.)
To: elbucko
These mentally ill also drove the increase in drug abuse. If you can show that the numerical increase in drug users is not substantially larger than the number of persons released by the Community Mental Health Centers Act, we'll have something to talk about. Otherwise you'll have failed to account for the former number.
89
posted on
12/27/2005 8:54:22 AM PST
by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
To: billorites
What word do all pot smokers say? Heeere!
To: elbucko
When they become violent and hurt others, not just themselves.Violent pot-smoking criminals aren't prosecuted for their crimes?
Who knew?
To: elbucko
you friggin ignorant moron!Always an effective posting strategy.
92
posted on
12/27/2005 8:58:57 AM PST
by
Protagoras
(If jumping to conclusions was an Olympic event, FR would be the training facility.)
To: Protagoras
Yawn. Isn't a little early for the seventh grade comments?I'm posting to the level of the argument.
93
posted on
12/27/2005 8:59:11 AM PST
by
elbucko
To: doctor noe
What word do all pot smokers say? Heeere! Dave Chappelle, is that you? :)
94
posted on
12/27/2005 9:00:16 AM PST
by
Freedom_no_exceptions
(No actual, intended, or imminent victim = no crime. No exceptions.)
To: Know your rights
Can't you just hear him saying it?
95
posted on
12/27/2005 9:01:50 AM PST
by
Xenalyte
(Tom Cruise is in my closet and he won't come out.)
To: sandbar
Yes...that is exactly part of the challenge with acute testing.
96
posted on
12/27/2005 9:02:00 AM PST
by
Pharmboy
(The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
To: elbucko
I'm posting to the level of the argument.Try posting to the level of this argument: "If you can show that the numerical increase in drug users is not substantially larger than the number of persons released by the Community Mental Health Centers Act, we'll have something to talk about. Otherwise you'll have failed to account for the former number."
97
posted on
12/27/2005 9:02:02 AM PST
by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
To: elbucko
I'm posting to the level of the argument.Correction, you SET the level of the argument.
Oh no! They made me do it! They made me post like that!
LOL
98
posted on
12/27/2005 9:02:34 AM PST
by
Protagoras
(If jumping to conclusions was an Olympic event, FR would be the training facility.)
To: Know your rights; mel
Don't forget post # 32 also...
99
posted on
12/27/2005 9:04:35 AM PST
by
Pharmboy
(The stone age didn't end because they ran out of stones.)
To: Protagoras
Always an effective posting strategy.Moron is as good as any for hose who propose the legalization of drugs before the national problem of the homeless and mentally ill on the street is addressed. The Pro-Pot croud are putting their own desire for personal pleasure ahead of our personal freedoms. The 2nd. Amendment being one of them.
100
posted on
12/27/2005 9:04:56 AM PST
by
elbucko
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 201-218 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson