Faithful people believe that God has a hand in everything. Why do you insist that science books must explicitly say that, when it's irrelevant to the subject of science? It's irrelevant, even for a faithful person, because they already believe, and it's distracting for those who don't, or who believe in a different "God".
What you say you want, I don't think you would like if you got it.
Sheez. Don't you get it? It isn't just "God" the judge would declare unacceptable by law, but the very notion that intelligent design can explain the organization of matter that behaves according to predictable laws. And again, this judge has declared atheistic science, and atheistic science alone, to be taught in a public academic setting. That's something Marx would do.