To: Michael_Michaelangelo
Good article you linked to. To bad the judge decided early on to apply a religious test to ID.
His a priori assumption doomed this case from the beginning, apparently. I guess I'd hoped for too much in hoping for a balanced judge.
313 posted on
12/20/2005 9:48:45 AM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
To: xzins
Too bad the Discovery Institute left a masssive paper trail documenting their motives.
316 posted on
12/20/2005 9:50:11 AM PST by
js1138
(Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
To: xzins
P-Marlowe is a lawyer in a successful practice in California. That doesn't make him right about everything legal, but it does make his a professional opinion.
If you already knew this, then just look at this note as someone attempting to pass along important info.
Xzins What's your point?
330 posted on
12/20/2005 9:55:05 AM PST by
js1138
(Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
To: xzins
His a priori assumption ... Maybe I'm wrong, but every time I see "a priori", I think "IDer". Just like when I see the term "sustainable", I think "Liberal".
How come you guys like that word so much? Or is that just one person making all those posts?
404 posted on
12/20/2005 10:18:27 AM PST by
narby
(Hillary! The Wicked Witch of the Left)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson