Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
Common descent is neither here nor there.

If the Dover school board thought that way, there would have been no interference with the science curriculum and no court case.

I have been checking this on FR for about six months now and have found only a couple of "ID" supporters who openly accept common descent. The majority of FReepers on these threads do not accept common descent and are surprised to find people like Behe take common descent for granted.

The fight over mechanisms will eventually come down to molecular biology and mathematics.

1,943 posted on 12/21/2005 12:34:56 PM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1933 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
I would argue against universal common descent if I was pushed on the matter if one defines the universal common antecedent as a single cell. But again it is neither here nor there in my world view.

What affects me and mine are judicail activists and their rooting sections. I'll argue that all day long without prodding.

1,949 posted on 12/21/2005 12:52:11 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1943 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson