[caffe]

Then perhaps I confused you with someone else who believed that if ID was actually allowed open for discussion in education, the poor children would never be qualified to become scientists. I also hope you agree that one may be a biologist or a physician and still reject Darwin.
Before I had children, I was a Registered Nurse and I don't feel any Doctor or patient had less confidence in me because I am a creationist. Actually, I was never asked. I somehow passed microbiology, anatomy and chemistry without swearing some oath to Darwin. I could even openly embrace the laws of thermodynamics!
Again, I thought you were the one who asserted the sky was falling if students did'nt have a complete Darwin indoctrination. Sorry about that.

[Dimensio]

Then perhaps I confused you with someone else who believed that if ID was actually allowed open for discussion in education, the poor children would never be qualified to become scientists.

That depends on how it's presented. If it's presented as science to children, then they will be at a fundamental disadvantage because they will have a completely inaccurate view of what science is.

I also hope you agree that one may be a biologist or a physician and still reject Darwin.

That depends on your particular field of study and/or practice, as well as how much of evolution you reject. I would certainly not trust a physician who refused to accept that strains of bacteria can "evolve" resistance to antibiotics.

I could even openly embrace the laws of thermodynamics!

What has this to do with the theory of evolution? You're not one of those who ignorantly thinks that evolution supposedly violates the laws of thermodynamics, are you?