[Dimensio]

Then perhaps I confused you with someone else who believed that if ID was actually allowed open for discussion in education, the poor children would never be qualified to become scientists.

That depends on how it's presented. If it's presented as science to children, then they will be at a fundamental disadvantage because they will have a completely inaccurate view of what science is.

I also hope you agree that one may be a biologist or a physician and still reject Darwin.

That depends on your particular field of study and/or practice, as well as how much of evolution you reject. I would certainly not trust a physician who refused to accept that strains of bacteria can "evolve" resistance to antibiotics.

I could even openly embrace the laws of thermodynamics!

What has this to do with the theory of evolution? You're not one of those who ignorantly thinks that evolution supposedly violates the laws of thermodynamics, are you?

[caffe]

"You're not one of those who ignorantly thinks that evolution supposedly violates the laws of thermodynamics, are you?"



Yes, I am one of those except i'm not ignorant.

Obviously, I believe in microevolution which has nothing in common with Darwin. All creationists and ID theorists have no problem with microevolution. We might have problems with certain extrapolations...

If you look at the number of people who reject Darwin or any other cheap imitations of Darwin, statistically speaking, your going to have tons of physicians, chemists, nurses, etc. who somehow managed to find success without being a "believer" Think about it!

Later, it's late