To: VadeRetro
One theory has about 150 years of fulfilled predictions behind it.And, the other has over 2000 years of belief.
1,486 posted on
12/20/2005 6:23:34 PM PST by
Road Warrior ‘04
(Kill 'em til they're dead! Then, kill 'em again!)
To: Bushbacker1
And, the other has over 2000 years of belief. Can't say that kind of thing impresses me by itself anymore.
1,505 posted on
12/20/2005 6:42:07 PM PST by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: Bushbacker1
And, the other has over 2000 years of belief. Gee, are you "conflating ID with creationism?" ;0
1,548 posted on
12/20/2005 7:13:20 PM PST by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: Bushbacker1
"And, the other has over 2000 years of belief."
And so do the Hindu creation myths. Even longer, actually. So, are they both correct? Why is yours right? Why is the Hindu creation mythology wrong?
For that matter, why is the creation story of the Chumash Indian religion wrong?
Belief is irrelevant.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson