The test of science is not how provable a theory is, but how reasonable it is. Provability and falsifiability are valuable tools, but they do not have a part in establishing the point of view from which the observer undertakes science. I don't see either side of the debate providing absolutely conclusive evidence for its assumptions, at least not in this life. What I hope to see is consideration for both points of view, both of which are reasonable.
"The test of science is not how provable a theory is, but how reasonable it is."
Many thanks for demonstrating that you don't know jack about science or the scientific method.