Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Intelligent Design case decided - Dover, Pennsylvania, School Board loses [Fox News Alert]
Fox News | 12/20/05

Posted on 12/20/2005 7:54:38 AM PST by snarks_when_bored

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,401-1,4201,421-1,4401,441-1,460 ... 3,381-3,391 next last
To: Dimensio

I have heard that Darwin reimbraced Christianity before he died.....any knowledge of the veracity of that?


1,421 posted on 12/20/2005 5:25:48 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1411 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
I guess I'm wrong. Watching NBC Nightly news (I don't have cable anymore, don't ask) I saw one of the women who sued the school board. She is a religious woman who goes to church and strongly believes in God. So I guess my assumption that only atheists liked this decision was way off.

Another thing that some folks might find surprising is that in the Dover case, the prosecution's primary expert witness on the subject of evolution was biologist Kenneth R. Miller, who is a devout Christian. He authored the book, "Finding Darwin's God", about common ground between God and evolution. Nonetheless, he feels that "ID" doesn't belong in science class and is not itself a science. He makes a good case for that position, and I (and many other people) agree with it.

1,422 posted on 12/20/2005 5:28:05 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1402 | View Replies]

To: andysandmikesmom
First the debunking of the Marx/Stalin/Darwin connection.. Now, the debunking of the 'Darwin recant' story... Next....

It's all been debunked, over and over. But it lives on in the creationist websites. From there, the stuff keeps finding its way into our threads. Endless nonsense.

1,423 posted on 12/20/2005 5:28:49 PM PST by PatrickHenry (... endless horde of misguided Luddites ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1413 | View Replies]

To: jbloedow
You see, I don't believe it was some massive weight of evidence that led all these people to believe in Marxism and Freudianism. I believe it was more presuppositional than evidential.

And you'd be right. But that is not the case for evolutionary biology, which has been built upon, and validated by, an overwhelming amount of evidence, along multiple independently cross-confirming lines.

1,424 posted on 12/20/2005 5:31:46 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1409 | View Replies]

To: Canard

Right.


1,425 posted on 12/20/2005 5:31:52 PM PST by Ceewrighter (O'er the land of the free and the Home of the brave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1375 | View Replies]

To: beaver fever

You just said thanks and all those who helped us along will see that and appreciate it...


1,426 posted on 12/20/2005 5:31:57 PM PST by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1415 | View Replies]

To: xzins
ID does not require the designer to be a sentient being.

What do you think you're doing on these threads? Tell me a story about where all the kinds of life we see on Earth now came from.

1,427 posted on 12/20/2005 5:32:13 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 933 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

FYI. O'Reilly and Napalitano(?) just trashed the decision


1,428 posted on 12/20/2005 5:33:18 PM PST by ml1954 (NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1423 | View Replies]

To: js1138

Inconsistent testifying, or misspeaking or just plain lying, its all about the same thing...and your are right, there sure is a lot of it going on here...


1,429 posted on 12/20/2005 5:33:30 PM PST by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1418 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
. . . biologist Kenneth R. Miller, who is a devout Christian.

What evidence leads you to conclude Kenneth R. Miller is "a devout Christian," and what does this observation have to do with the veracity, or lack thereof, in deducing intelligent design from the presence of organized matter the behaves according to predictable laws?

1,430 posted on 12/20/2005 5:34:48 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1422 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
Do you know what these words mean?

I shd prefer the Part or Volume not to be dedicated to me (though I thank you for the intended honour) as this implies to a certain extent my approval of the general publication, about which I know nothing...

1,431 posted on 12/20/2005 5:35:17 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 946 | View Replies]

To: airforceF4
Telling me i "gotta believe" isn't science.

Are you saying you are bucking the trend to blindly accept Darwinism?

1,432 posted on 12/20/2005 5:35:46 PM PST by 4woodenboats (Luke 2: A Christmas story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; CarolinaGuitarman; Dimensio; Ichneumon; Lurking Libertarian

I know its a lot of endless nonsense, and it unfortunately does keep popping up here...but, thankfully, there are more than enough folks here, who know where to guide those of us who are looking for 'facts', not made up stories...

It probably is a bit trying for the regulars to keep going over and over the same stuff, but from me, and I am sure, from many other posters, and from all the lurkers, we send our many thanks....be patient with us, we are learning, and the only way we will learn is to ask questions...

Appreciate the time you all give to us..


1,433 posted on 12/20/2005 5:38:42 PM PST by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1423 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
And the important thing too is that the book Darwin declined to have dedicated to him was not Kapital, but a book called *The Student Darwin*. There was never an attempt by Marx to have Kapital dedicated to Darwin.
1,434 posted on 12/20/2005 5:39:11 PM PST by CarolinaGuitarman ("There is a grandeur in this view of life...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1431 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Just damn - good news.


1,435 posted on 12/20/2005 5:39:16 PM PST by Ben Chad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

This issue is still being debated. And, as was mentioned earlier, was only explored after citing the inconsistencies. Still, the fact remains: there are wide gaps in the fossil record - especially when tracing human descent


1,436 posted on 12/20/2005 5:39:20 PM PST by Ceewrighter (O'er the land of the free and the Home of the brave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1412 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGuitarman; eleni121
You are stretching for something, but you are not reaching it.

Too much stretching turns into what Mark Twain called "stretchers."

1,437 posted on 12/20/2005 5:39:35 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 966 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

They mean Darwin was smart enough to weasel his way out of directly endorsing a controversial publication. Some might call it "testifying inconsistently."


1,438 posted on 12/20/2005 5:39:48 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1431 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I have heard that Darwin reimbraced Christianity before he died.....any knowledge of the veracity of that?

The only source of that claim is the debunked "Lady Hope" story. She claimed that Charles personally told her of his rejection of Christianity at his deathbed, but none of Charles Darwin's immediate family ever remembered her being there or remembered him ever expressing such sentiments.
1,439 posted on 12/20/2005 5:40:50 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1421 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Isn't it interesting how anytime a judge doesn't rule the way someone wants, the judge is knee-jerkedly labeled "activist" and legislating from the bench. All from people who claim to read and understand the constitution but fail to read and comprehend science.


1,440 posted on 12/20/2005 5:42:13 PM PST by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,401-1,4201,421-1,4401,441-1,460 ... 3,381-3,391 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson