I'm sure you'll point me to the post where I say that, because Hovind cheats on his taxes, his opinions on evolution should be summarily dismissed. Otherwise, this looks more to me like you seeing something that isn't there. He is, in fact, a fraud and a tax cheat, but anything you infer from those facts is your handiwork, not mine.
My original post was concerning the irony of the ping listers mocking the CREVOs for their numerous straw men all the while claiming Hovind's arguments have no validity while never addressing them specifically for the most part.
Kinda like saying George Bush is a bad president because he says his prayers.
It seems that you are using the same logically fallacy.