[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Furthermore, post 461 was not even addressed to me."

Did I say it was? No.

"That seems to be your favorite post. It's like a sweet morsel to you. Like a pig wallowing in filth you'd like to spread it around and pretend all Christians are complicit in unwarranted acts of violence."

That's a lie. My whole family are Christians. They think that terrorism in all it's forms is bad. They don't support the likes of Eric Rudolph. I have NEVER implicated ALL Christians in anything. I am talking about particular so-called Christians who have no problem being apologists for blowing people up.

" Maybe I should respond to the remainder of your posts in "oinks."

Would raise the standard of your posts.

[RadioAstronomer]

Would raise the standard of your posts.

ROFL!!

[Fester Chugabrew]

Did I say [post 461] was [addressed to you]? No.

Then why do you link me to that post by implication? You essentially think unsatisfactory reaction to a post you find objectionable is reason to believe I am some how linked to its intent. Not only myself, but anyone else who does not join in your self-righteous chest beating.

I am talking about particular so-called Christians who have no problem being apologists for blowing people up.

Are you a pacifist? Do you believe there is absolutely no condition under which another person's life should be taken by force?

Also, why haven't you criticized the professor who set up a class for the purpose of ridiculing people's beliefs? In your failure to criticize his actions you have proven that you support such classes. Why do you support university classes that are designed to make fun of people? I haven't seen you denounce such classes, so that must mean you support them.

[Fester Chugabrew]

Would raise the standard of your posts.

In your case I believe it.