[CarolinaGuitarman]

"I would, too."

Then why do you support people here who have called his actions heroic and praiseworthy?


So, you condone the bombing of abortion clinics then.

---

"You seem to be well-practiced at non-seqiturs."

No, it's a logical conclusion if you think that
"genocidal tyrants" should be killed, and you realize that abortion doctors were lumped into that group in post 461. There is no other conclusion possible.

[Fester Chugabrew]

Then why do you support people here who have called his actions heroic and praiseworthy?

My posts have not indicated support for anyone's position but my own. Post #461 does not contain "praise." You just wish it did. It merely raises questions anyone is free to answer.

No, it's a logical conclusion . . .

It is not a logical conclusion to assume someone condones the bombing of abortion clinics when he merely states that beating up a loony professor is not on the same level as dealing with genocidal tyrants or abortionists.

It is a logical conclusion however, to assume someone is both delusional and disingenuous when he continually talks about terrorism in a thread related to pugilism in an attempt to paint other people in a bad light. But hey, since you can't tell the difference between sarcasm and gloating it stands to reason you can't tell the difference between beating up a loony professor and dealing with genocidal tyrants.