"No, it is not. That is why I find the subject to be unrelated to the topic at hand."
The topic we were discussing is post 461 when one of your creationist buddies said that blowing people up was just fine. I DIDN'T BRING IT UP. Nobody forced him to bring it up; nobody goaded him into it. He offered it up freely. That you refuse to deal with the post, and the subsequent posts that praised blowing people up, and specifically the actions of Eric Rudolph, says much about either your moral cowardice, or your moral depravity. You can't even bring it upon yourself to condemn the actions of terrorists.
No. You have been making post 461 your topic of choice. Once that post appreared you decided to railroad the thread into a discussion about terrorism. There are other threads to discuss terrorism. You can even start your own thread about Eric Rudolph and invite the rest of us to posit our opinions about the guy.
For the the time being I would simply like to know why you and your cheerleaders have refrained from criticizing this loopy professor for setting up a class dedicated toward the ridicule of people with different beliefs. I would also like to know how you fail to recognize the connection between his inflammatory remarks and the potential for physical recourse on the part of looopy fanatics.