[CarolinaGuitarman]

I think Jeff was also alluding to the fact that most of your *scientists* were not even trained in biology.

And you still haven't answered my critique (post 579) of one of your links, nor have you answered why Pinker and Bloom's article is listed in your anti-Darwinian list of works, when the thesis of their paper is,

"Reviewing other arguments and data, we conclude that there is every reason to believe that a specialization for grammar evolved by a conventional neo-Darwinian process."
http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/OldArchive/bbs.pinker.html

How much other padding is in that list?

[Sun]

I do believe you are knit-picking.

I provided access to well over a thousand names.

Now let's see why Coyne was wrong here:

http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&id=2933&program=CSC+-+Views+and+News