However, you also said that the 700 scientists only had one-year of science in high school (which is not true; they are scientists), and then I gave you 400 scientists with credentials, so it seems to me that you are looking for any pie-in-the sky excuse to discredit any scientist or nonscientist who believes in ID, or is even skeptical of the evo theory.
So how can I believe you?
And how can you believe yourself?
I think Jeff was also alluding to the fact that most of your *scientists* were not even trained in biology.
And you still haven't answered my critique (post 579) of one of your links, nor have you answered why Pinker and Bloom's article is listed in your anti-Darwinian list of works, when the thesis of their paper is,
"Reviewing other arguments and data, we conclude that there is every reason to believe that a specialization for grammar evolved by a conventional neo-Darwinian process."
http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/OldArchive/bbs.pinker.html
How much other padding is in that list?