[Nathan Zachary]

You are the one with your fingers in your ears yelling NANANANANANANA!

I'm not going to bother looking everything up for you. it's been posted many times over. The point made is that evolution theory says life created itself. the frog is an example of what that theory assumes happened. In fact, that blended frg is giving evolution theory a chance, because all the ingredients are there, unlike at the begining of time on this planet. "evolution theory says NOTHING about the origin of life

there you go with your fingers again. Go google it for yourself. I'm sick and tired of posting it for you "evolutionists" who have obviously not read the theory you proffess to support.

[Dimensio]

The point made is that evolution theory says life created itself.

No, it doesn't. You are a liar.

[shuckmaster]

The point made is that evolution theory says life created itself.

Does creationist theory say you can lie your way into heaven?

[b_sharp]

"I'm not going to bother looking everything up for you. it's been posted many times over. The point made is that evolution theory says life created itself. the frog is an example of what that theory assumes happened. In fact, that blended frg is giving evolution theory a chance, because all the ingredients are there, unlike at the begining of time on this planet. "evolution theory says NOTHING about the origin of life

If you want to talk about abiogenesis instead of evolutions, that's fine. Abiogenesis, or life from non-life postulates that early life started with self-replicating chemicals, something we have observed, and through the natural tendency of certain chemicals to combine in specific ways, a compound similar to RNA was formed. It would not be necessary for DNA to form for a long time. Abiognesis would only result in the simplest of organisms, such as a prion.

That blended frog may or may not contain all the chemicals necessary to jump start abiogenesis. In any case, a frog is a collection of interacting simple cells, something that took evolution time, billions of replications and various types of selection to produce. Can your vial of blended frog give 3.5 billions years, ensure imperfect replication and selection to eliminate environmentally bad combinations?

[Vive ut Vivas]

I'm sick and tired of posting it for you "evolutionists" who have obviously not read the theory you proffess to support.

And in the same post you mischaracterize evolution: The point made is that evolution theory says life created itself.

I'm thrilled that you assume that people that have dedicated their lives to the study of evolution know absolutely nothing compared to you. Aren't we just lucky to have you to tell everyone what the theory really is. Ever taken a college level biology class? Or even high school level? If so, you would know that the theory of evolution says absolutely nothing about "life creating itself". You'd think that those of us that have devoted a decent amount of time to studying it would have caught on to this by now, if it were true. But of course, you know more, so let's all bow down.