Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Returning to Dover [evolution trial in Dover, PA: week 2]
York Daily Record [Penna] ^ | 03 October 2005 | TERESA MCMINN

Posted on 10/03/2005 6:22:51 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

After a weekend break from a court case involving intelligent design, the Dover school board officials will face business as usual. The board today will hold its first school board meeting since the trial began.

On Sunday, Dover school board member David Napierski said he sympathized with the time fellow members Shelia Harkins and Alan Bonsell have spent on the court case.

“I really haven’t seen it erode them from their duties,” he said. “It definitely has taken a lot of their time . . . I think it is sapping some of the people, too.”

The trial began Sept. 26 in U.S. Middle District Court in Harrisburg. It resumes Wednesday.

Napierski hopes to attend at least one day per week of the trial.

“We’re seeing one side of the whole picture right now,” he said. “I think it’s going to go all the way up to the Supreme Court.”

He said dealing with the court case while running the school district is a “double-edged sword.

“I just hope and pray that our focus will stay on business,” he said.

School district residents might have a difficult time resuming day-to-day life as it was before the trial began.

Lonnie Langioni left his position as a school board member in Dover in 2003. He said the issue has divided the community and he wants folks to again be friends.

“We’re just going to have to let it run its course,” he said about the trial. “I’m just waiting for the day that this is all over and that the people of Dover can go back to talking to each other again.”

He said he follows the case and reads newspapers and articles online.

“It’s crossed all kinds of lines,” he said of the trial. “Dover is a great community. We all need to respect each others’ viewpoints.”

Former Dover school board member Barrie Callahan, a plaintiff in the court case, is ready to spend more time in court this week.

“The case needs to proceed,” she said Saturday. “I know the issue. To see it through the process is truly fascinating.

“You’re seeing the best of the best,” she said about attorneys. “It is an honor to be in their presence.”

She said she’s been following news of the trial posted online.

“It’s not about little tiny Dover,” she said. “This case really, really is important.”

UPDATE

Trial schedule: The trial resumes Wednesday and Thursday in U.S. Middle District Court in Harrisburg and is scheduled to continue Oct. 12, 14, 17 through 21, 24, 27 and Nov. 2 through 4.

At stake: It’s the most significant court challenge to evolution since 1987, and it’s the first time a court has been asked to rule whether intelligent design can be taught in public schools. Experts say the case’s outcome could influence how science is defined and taught in schools across the country. The lead defense lawyer said he wanted to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Coming this week: Among the scheduled witnesses: Dover school district science teacher Bertha Spahr and Jennifer Miller and plaintiffs Cynthia Sneath, Joel Leib and Deb Fenimore.

Barbara Forrest, a professor of philosophy at Southeastern Louisiana University, also is scheduled. Forrest co-authored “Creationism’s Trojan Horse,” subtitled “The Wedge of Intelligent Design.”


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: crevolist; dover; evolution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 581-582 next last
To: js1138
How about the Krell complex?


501 posted on 10/04/2005 1:03:04 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
If I thought anyone really saw me like that, I'd never let them in the door.

You don't have daughters that mess with you at every opportunity?

502 posted on 10/04/2005 1:06:04 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
Bad enough my cat is indifferent to litter-box training.
503 posted on 10/04/2005 1:08:18 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
Seymore Krelborn. Coincidence? I think not.


504 posted on 10/04/2005 1:08:34 PM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp
Design is necessary for the function of science. You know what happens to physics and cosmology if someone suggests the fundamental constants change over time.
505 posted on 10/04/2005 1:11:44 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 483 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Design is necessary for the function of science. You know what happens to physics and cosmology if someone suggests the fundamental constants change over time.

As in someone or some entity constantly tinkering with them once they're in motion?

506 posted on 10/04/2005 1:14:21 PM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Surely you meant "tooth" ;)

Let's get the main ones out of the way:

Then again, maybe enough is enough.
507 posted on 10/04/2005 1:14:35 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: RightWingNilla
You really should try going to collidge...

"Collage" mispeld.

I shouldn't joke about this stuff for a while. Couldn't have done it without FR's patented spell-checker, but I misspelled "cataloging" as "Catalonia" last night.

508 posted on 10/04/2005 1:16:49 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

Now, now - we love West Byrdlandia. Or whatever the Congressionally-mandated name is now ;)


509 posted on 10/04/2005 1:19:40 PM PDT by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Right. If the speed of light in vacuum, or the force of gravity, have changed since the Big Bang, the formulas and neat canonical solutions bite the dust. In this sense, evolution would make science impossible. This is what makes biology a soft science: you don't know what you are going to get with the next generation, you can't predict very well.
510 posted on 10/04/2005 1:20:19 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies]

To: js1138

LOL!!

Seymore...


511 posted on 10/04/2005 1:22:16 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro

Eeeek!!


512 posted on 10/04/2005 1:22:42 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
In this sense, evolution would make science impossible.

This is backwards. There'd be no science, therefore no evolution. And we wouldn't be here either.

513 posted on 10/04/2005 1:24:46 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 510 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
Pheeeww!!!
514 posted on 10/04/2005 1:25:31 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 512 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Particularly with all those competing deities tinkering with the genome.


515 posted on 10/04/2005 1:25:37 PM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 510 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp; <1/1,000,000th%; VadeRetro

516 posted on 10/04/2005 1:27:34 PM PDT by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
This is backwards.

It's a Hegelian unity.

517 posted on 10/04/2005 1:28:35 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 513 | View Replies]

To: js1138

Wannabees. Demiurges. Tradesmen.


518 posted on 10/04/2005 1:30:00 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I hope this isn't going to turn into another Karl Marx thread. ;)


519 posted on 10/04/2005 1:42:19 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%

It doesn't matter. It's in the backroom now.


520 posted on 10/04/2005 1:44:13 PM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 581-582 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson