Posted on 10/03/2005 6:22:51 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
You are assuming that with your (man's) limited understanding you can discern "typo's" in the first place.
Gills did not evolve into lungs. The lungs are a slightly modified flotation bladder.
Another example of how the US needs to get tough about keeping hostile foreigners out of our country.
Another example of how the US needs to get tough about keeping hostile foreigners out of our country.
Everyone her I talk to knows where i work and live, too bad YOU don't. And if you look at my posts at FR which I haven't posted to in a very long time, there are not any "Anti American" Posts there. Quite the opposite.
you are a bloody liar. Now, if you can't argue the topic respectfully, then stay out of it.
trying to create hatred of me is a childish, imature thing.
So when you called for Canada to ban American beef after discovery of the one mad-cow case in Washington State (which, it turns out, came from Alberta) thus attempting to damage the economy of my country and my state, you weren't being anti-American?
And when you agreed with Michael Moore that Americans are the dumbest people on the planet, that wasn't anti-American?
Or like a crayfish, some live in creeks others dig holes in a pasture, but they are all still crayfish, or other crustaceans some in water some on land, still a crustacean.
Wolf
Another ungrounded, unfounded, unsubstantiated yet sweeping assertion from you. Completely shameless.
yeah, sure. and the fossil record is where?
In case you've never gutted a fish, a air bladder is quite a bit different from lung material, and is located in the intestinal tract. Picture how that fish would 'breathe', LoL!
Well I think the prof has actually said us Americans are pretty dumb himself.
Wolf
Really? where's the proof for your statement? I at least offer up statements from some of them who manage the largest museums on the planet.
Evolution is not based solely on the fossil record. There is the genetic record, and the embryonic developmental record that also contribute evidence.
Yes, but we know exactly who he was referring to.
Cool. There's evidently more than one way to skin a cat.
" I at least offer up statements from some of them who manage the largest museums on the planet."
Like Colin Patterson?
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/patterson.html
If you want to talk about abiogenesis instead of evolutions, that's fine. Abiogenesis, or life from non-life postulates that early life started with self-replicating chemicals, something we have observed, and through the natural tendency of certain chemicals to combine in specific ways, a compound similar to RNA was formed. It would not be necessary for DNA to form for a long time. Abiognesis would only result in the simplest of organisms, such as a prion.
That blended frog may or may not contain all the chemicals necessary to jump start abiogenesis. In any case, a frog is a collection of interacting simple cells, something that took evolution time, billions of replications and various types of selection to produce. Can your vial of blended frog give 3.5 billions years, ensure imperfect replication and selection to eliminate environmentally bad combinations?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.