Posted on 07/04/2005 6:39:22 PM PDT by TexKat
Mountain Brook High School graduate Natalee Holloway went missing May 30 during a senior trip to Aruba.
AP photo
"The younger Van Der Sloot, born Aug. 6, 1987, may have been romantically involved with the 18-year-old Holloway the night she disappeared. He met Holloway at a hotel casino two days before she was last seen, Aruban Police Commander Jahn van der Straaten told reporters."
I think that PVDS thing was why he was taken in for the hearing. I recall one of the higher ups stating something regarding a decrepency in his timeline and PVDS could not remember or was confused. I will try to find where I read that or saw that tomorrow. Its late. Goodnite all!!
I forgot about Deepak possibly being back online. Maybe that was one of his sites? Think I heard that their lawyer told them not do any interviews because of the investigation. But, I could be wrong about that.
thats around site 85, yes?
It would not surprise me to learn that daddy himself was involved in the act that resulted in her disappearance in a way exceeding most of what has been postulated publicly so far. If what I just said makes you cringe, you understood it.
Was that the admission to Mickey John?
I recall hearing Americans would be DEVASTATED.
I have no idea.
I remember Beth using devastated the other night...I thought her husband said shocked tonight. Either way it's strong language from people who I think have been the picture of composure and understatement given the circumstances.
Thank you. So it is possible PVDS changed his story 3 times. Twice for sure.
"Did B/H just say that her entry regarding the 4am pick up of Joran by his father was SECOND HAND information?
Yes.She said they had two witnesses who heard him say that."
I thought she had said that she heard him say that he had picked up Joran at 4am twice and that she had 10 witnesses. Then Greta, after remarking that she had looked through the journal, asked her if there was a 4:30am entry and BH had remarked that there was but that one was based on second-hand information.
**
"The last thread was IN the smokey backroom."
Maybe I should've said that I've been reading through the 5 "extended" threads. If any of those were in the smokey backroom then I'm just plain ole confused...I thought maybe it was an area that I didn't have access to. Thanks.
"Let's be very clear on this point. Yes, it was second hand information, but there are 10 witnesses to PvdS statement."
I realize this, however, I was under the impression that the 10 witnesses were with regard to his two 4am statements; while the 4:30am time were obtained via secondhand information.
were = was
" It would not surprise me to learn that daddy himself was involved in the act that resulted in her disappearance in a way exceeding most of what has been postulated publicly so far. "
It wouldn't surprise me either. His wife just happened to be out of town on the night in question. If true, it makes the blame game, Juran played with his Mom, even more sinister. :( :(
I'm furiously trying to scan through these posts that I missed since I had to get back to work and then get home. I am going to watch the re-run of Greta tho. I'm glad she's back in Aruba.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.