[expatguy]

But perhaps Stephanieflutter has a point to make.

Why the outrage over this sexual perversion? Would those here in this thread be less offended if somehow it could be proven that the sex with the animal was consensual?

The kid is sick, but he is no sicker than a homosexual person.

[Junior_G]

Why the outrage over this sexual perversion? Would those here in this thread be less offended if somehow it could be proven that the sex with the animal was consensual?

The kid is sick, but he is no sicker than a homosexual person.

Is your whole point that you don't like gays? Yours is a demented statement, regardless of one's take on homosexuality.

[ShadowDancer]

Why the outrage over this sexual perversion? Would those here in this thread be less offended if somehow it could be proven that the sex with the animal was consensual?

The kid is sick, but he is no sicker than a homosexual person.

Have you lost your mind? Why the outrage? Did it escape your attention that this piece of garbage also raped two young girls?

[followerofchrist]

"Why the outrage over this sexual perversion? Would those here in this thread be less offended if somehow it could be proven that the sex with the animal was consensual?"

Like young children, even if the sensation feels good they don't have the mental capacity to consent to sex.

[Zunt Toad]

Why the outrage over this sexual perversion? Would those here in this thread be less offended if somehow it could be proven that the sex with the animal was consensual?

It is quite presumptuous of the DA to assume that the dog was not a willing partner.

(< /sarcasm)