Are they necessarily wrong?
I don't know if they are or not, but I also suspect that a good number of them did a knee-jerk response and started the name calling, "Shill!!". Did they read the report? Did they do any research on Dr. Wolfson? Did they research the report to find out how it was compiled? I doubt many of them did. I don't know how objective the report is, but I did read it. I'm not willing to throw it in the fire just yet.