Exactly right. This is an evolutionist tactic that is getting really old: Demand proof or evidence, then ignore it when it's presented.
Exactly right. This is an evolutionist tactic that is getting really old: Demand proof or evidence, then ignore it when it's presented.
Nice empty, unsupported allegation you've got there. Typical of you, though.
The astute reader will note that what has *really* happened is that the creationists on this thread (including Dataman) are making *excuses* for why they won't support their claims, instead of just supporting going ahead and supporting them.
The funny part is that they often spend more time making these excuses than it would have taken them to actually like to supporting material -- if any support actually existed.
Instead, they just bluster and whine and accuse, trying to distract the readers' attention from the fact that the evolutionists keep ASKING for evidence and support, and the creationists keep AVOIDING such requests.
Then Dataman caps it off with the dishonest implication that sometime in the (distant?) past, the creationists actually *did* deign at least once to bother to support their claims, and that (allegedly) the evolutionists "ignore" it.
(The credibility of this assertion is left as an exercise to the reader, given how often and thoroughly the evolutionists are *all over* various creationist claims and arguments...)
And thus, the creationists (and Dataman) bluster, "we don't need to show no stinkin' support!" Well hey, guys, if you want to just keep insisting that everyone take your assertions on your word alone, and that you don't need to provide any support for them, and that "creation science" is (allegedly) based on anything resembling actual science but doesn't need to provide any evidence when asked, well, go for it. Good luck with that one.
"Our Emperor has clothes, really! They're just, um, at the cleaners, and you wouldn't believe they were actual clothes even if we showed them to you, that's why we won't, so there. Yeah, that's the ticket..."
(Note: These are the same guys who want their "alternative (non)theory" taught in schools along with evolution -- yet seem awfully resistant to actually *show* us any of it...)