[Ichneumon]

OK, but that's YOUR problem, not Ken Ham's. Just because you do not like him, or his positions, does not mean that they are false (or true).

No, of course not. What *does* mean that Hovind's materials are false is the documentation I've linked on this thread.

[Oztrich Boy]

Actually Itchy, we've moved on from Hovind. What my "problem, not Ken Ham's" is, is that I consider Ken Ham lacking in basic human decency - his views on evolution aside.