And the discovery of DNA bolsters Darwinism how exactly?
So you're now waffling away from your stance that none of Darwin's hypothesis have been proven, now that you've been shown to be wrong.
"And the discovery of DNA bolsters Darwinism how exactly?"
Someone asked for an example of Darwins hypotheses being proved right. That was an example.
Thats what you do with hypotheses, you use them to predict something else. The (at the time) hypothesis of evolution suggested that there would have to be some "physical carrier" (now known as DNA) of information from one organism to it's offspring.