Why don't you try posting some facts instead of attacks? Because you don't have any?
It says more about you than it does about me. Try reading the court transcript and report back when you have one teensie little fact at your disposal.
All I've been doing is refuting the lies from the FR death squad. This is all about facts. If you choose to ignore them, I can understand the motivation.
is to do what the EDITOR and CHIEF to the Journal of Physicians and Surgeons,(JAMA's sister), said is the moral and ethical thing to do. ( watched via internet streaming last week)...
he said...
"since such fantastic advances have been made in understanding the brain injured..."
that " he has worked and had had success with patients far more brain damaged than Terri from what he could access from brain scan, medical records and poor quality video tapes" and he further asked the question, "who would deny Terri the latest testing available, especially with the potential correct therapy might have in bringing TERRI TO THE POINT WHERE SHE CAN TELL ALL OF US EXACTLY WHAT SHE WANTS!
I cannot imagine ANY FREEPER BEING AGAINST THIS!
And maybe...michael is right. And more importantly, maybe the Schindler's are right.
Who would ever, based on hearsay from a monster, who happens to have once been married to terri, with all that brings like odometer checks and exact, to the penny accounting practices, NOT SIDE ON LIFE...Terri may want to LIVE with all of her HEART! To not defend that...is to go against the BILL OF RIGHTS of this NATION.
Not all spouses are equal. Some are good, some are fantastic, some are horrific and some are deadly.
Let's not gamble with this much loved life.
Some guardians are evil.
Do we in America fail to defend their victems? Which trumps? Life and liberty or the marriage vow?