To: Dr. Eckleburg; connectthedots; RnMomof7; jude24; suzyjaruki; Gamecock; HarleyD; topcat54; ...
I'd push the abuse botton on you, ctd, but I want everyone to see what you're up to between your doctor appointments. Perhaps rather than getting snippy about it and slinging a personal insult, you could just show ctd why he's wrong about you believing 7,8 and 9. Those seem to be the points in contention.
I wouldn't necessarily make the claim he did. But I think he sincerely has reason to believe you fit in that category.
If he's wrong, you've no reason to be defensive.
204 posted on
12/17/2004 7:33:58 PM PST by
Corin Stormhands
(CHRISTmas: One season. One reason.)
To: Corin Stormhands
If he's wrong, you've no reason to be defensive With that logic, I could call you a syphilitic quacking duck, and you'd have no reason to be defensive because it's not true.
None of ctd's points is accurate. That's my point.
206 posted on
12/17/2004 7:41:09 PM PST by
Dr. Eckleburg
(There are very few shades of gray.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson