Replies

To: Corin Stormhands

If he's wrong, you've no reason to be defensive

With that logic, I could call you a syphilitic quacking duck, and you'd have no reason to be defensive because it's not true.

None of ctd's points is accurate. That's my point.

206 posted on 12/17/2004 7:41:09 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)

To: Dr. Eckleburg; connectthedots

With that logic, I could call you a syphilitic quacking duck, and you'd have no reason to be defensive because it's not true.

I wouldn't have to be defensive because there's no amount of truth in that. So it doesn't offend me. It would be a stupid charge.

Something in what ctd says strikes a nerve. Why is that?

210 posted on 12/17/2004 7:53:05 PM PST by Corin Stormhands (CHRISTmas: One season. One reason.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794