Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CALVINISM IN AMERICA
Reformed Theology ^ | Loraine Boettner

Posted on 12/16/2004 1:23:28 PM PST by Gamecock

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 1,001-1,019 next last
To: Dr. Eckleburg; topcat54; Alex Murphy; RnMomof7; Gamecock; AZhardliner

I agree. There are various shades of Calvinism and Calvinists who hold various doctrinal beliefs and understandings but I don't believe for one moment there is such a thing as "hyper-Calvinism". I think it's meant to be derisive and, I agree with Dr. E, it is meant to divide the Calvinists. If this was not true, one would think there would be a "hyper-Arminian" which there isn't and cannot be defined.

There are those who hold the monergist belief and those who hold the synergist belief. Each side has their extremes but there is no third category.


141 posted on 12/17/2004 1:23:08 PM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; xzins; Revelation 911
Pinging you to this post as I'm totally speechless.

But that'll pass...

142 posted on 12/17/2004 1:25:16 PM PST by Corin Stormhands (CHRISTmas: One season. One reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: xzins; RnMomof7; Corin Stormhands; HarleyD; Alex Murphy; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; topcat54; Gamecock

"No King But Christ."

The story of Donald Cargill by Maurice Grant

~~"Hairbreadth escapes, night-time journeys to avoid pursuing soldiers, exile, the public excommunication of King Charles II and his principal ministers for their crimes against God and his church, arrest and the gallows - these are all part of the dramatic story of Donald Cargill.

Set in Scotland in the colourful days of the Restoration of the monarchy under Charles II, when to preach without licence from the Crown was an offence punishable by imprisonment, banishment and even death, this book tells the story of one of the most noted and loved preachers of the day, who defied the king and Privy Council and was in consequence branded 'rebel and traitor' for refusing to acknowledge their jurisdiction over the church. Cargill was prepared to face years of privation and constant danger, and ultimately death itself, rather than surrender the rights of Christ alone to be Head of the church.

"No King but Christ" is a challenge to faithfulness and a striking testimony of the grace of God which enabled Cargill to face a violent and cruel death with the words: 'The Lord knows, I go up this ladder with less fear and perturbation of mind than ever I entered the pulpit to preach... Farewell, all relations and friends in Christ; farewell, all acquaintances and all earthly enjoyments; farewell, reading and preaching, praying and believing, wanderings, reproaches and sufferings. Welcome, joy unspeakable and full of glory. Welcome, Father, Son and Holy Ghost! Into thy hands I commit my spirit.'"~~

143 posted on 12/17/2004 1:26:09 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; Alex Murphy; RnMomof7; Gamecock; AZhardliner; HarleyD
And I'm not a fan of Iain Murray. I find the dissection of Calvinism into various camps to be a lot like the link you provided -- gibberish.

Perhaps, but I don't think so. It's irrational to deny what exists within what passes as Calvinistic circles. Relabeling it is no solution.

It's obvious that the hyper-calvinists like those in the PRC don't like the label. But remember the label was bestowed by other Reformed people, not by Arminians.

144 posted on 12/17/2004 1:26:37 PM PST by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: topcat54; Dr. Eckleburg; Alex Murphy; RnMomof7; Gamecock; AZhardliner; HarleyD; P-Marlowe; xzins
But remember the label was bestowed by other Reformed people, not by Arminians.

Thank you.

145 posted on 12/17/2004 1:28:30 PM PST by Corin Stormhands (CHRISTmas: One season. One reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
He was a man that was obviously supporting the church state (and the religious persecution that followed it )in America by his position on it .

Wesley was the first to provide for the colonists. Wesley had been a colonist. Wesley spent vast sums of time, energy, and money on the colonies.

Wesley was the one who angered his brother by providing for the colonists to break from Anglicanism.

I'd like to think I was seeing your prejudice toward the deceased Rev. Wesley. I'm afraid I'm simply seeing the extent of your education.

146 posted on 12/17/2004 1:28:52 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Preach on Brother xzins. I'd like to learn more...


147 posted on 12/17/2004 1:33:07 PM PST by Corin Stormhands (CHRISTmas: One season. One reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; P-Marlowe; Corin Stormhands; Revelation 911

So, then, Marlowe is a lenient calvinist. And the old-school primitive baptists are strict calvinists.

But... all are calvinists?


148 posted on 12/17/2004 1:44:28 PM PST by xzins (The Party Spirit -- the major issue that keeps me from taking them seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands
Pinging you to this post as I'm totally speechless.

Well, that's a first. :O)

149 posted on 12/17/2004 1:46:54 PM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
Well, that's a first. :O)

It was probably just lunch...

150 posted on 12/17/2004 1:47:40 PM PST by Corin Stormhands (CHRISTmas: One season. One reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands; RnMomof7; xzins
Not so with the Articles of Confederation.

Thus the Constitutional Convention.

151 posted on 12/17/2004 1:50:31 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: xzins; RnMomof7

The discussion is interesting. You shouldn't make it personal, x.


152 posted on 12/17/2004 1:52:06 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

????


153 posted on 12/17/2004 1:53:26 PM PST by xzins (The Party Spirit -- the major issue that keeps me from taking them seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
There are those who hold the monergist belief and those who hold the synergist belief. Each side has their extremes but there is no third category.

Excellent way of putting it.

154 posted on 12/17/2004 1:53:54 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

It wasn't personal. Her history is lacking. Should I pretend she's correct?

YOU (of all people) as wanting me to pretend to be PC???


155 posted on 12/17/2004 1:56:31 PM PST by xzins (The Party Spirit -- the major issue that keeps me from taking them seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; RnMomof7; xzins

That was not the point.

BTW, did you know Beethoven was a Mason? ;-)


156 posted on 12/17/2004 1:59:52 PM PST by Corin Stormhands (CHRISTmas: One season. One reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Corin Stormhands

And the Russians invented television.


157 posted on 12/17/2004 2:26:18 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

Now this is the truth ... Al Gore invented the internet. :>)


158 posted on 12/17/2004 3:00:21 PM PST by xzins (The Party Spirit -- the major issue that keeps me from taking them seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: topcat54

Luther sought to reform the Church. Later Reformers did nothing more than throw the baby out with the bathwater.


159 posted on 12/17/2004 4:05:18 PM PST by Styria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Just because people who attended Presbyterian Churches in America were a predominant factor in the revolution against England does not in any way mean that it was the soteriology of the revolutionaries that led to the revolution.

But Calvinist soteriology does directly relate to the system of government they set up. I mean the first point, total depravity, and all the anthopological doctrine surrounding it, in particular.

160 posted on 12/17/2004 4:17:16 PM PST by A.J.Armitage (http://calvinist-libertarians.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 1,001-1,019 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson