For one thing, you didn't ask me. For another, I've looked it up before. If I can look it up, you can look it up. If you want to know, look it up and stop pretending you earn points for being an idiot. I'm tired of bringing you answers you make such an incredible point of not understanding or remembering.
DODGED: How much of the geologic record has been exposed for scientific observation and study?
You are a damned and damnable liar. I met this head on in post 1522. For a person unwilling to see a micron below the exposed surface, a quality you have not denied being true of you, the percentage of the Earth interior volume which can be said to have been explored is zero. Now rot in Hell.
DODGED: How does Stoke's Law apply to a reptile ascending a river bed?
What are you even babbling about? Look at what Stokes's Law is. What you said about little rocks sinking faster than big rocks is wrong. It was pointed out. You have been given a web site on Stokes's Law. Didn't do much for your education, did it? When you figure out what reptiles(?) ascending a river have to do with anything, you can explain it to the rest of us. I personally don't think it shows anything good about what you're arguing when you depend upon an utter falsehood and must pretend not to understand when your falsehood is pointed out.
DODGED: Where has science observed the PROCESS of evolution?
Why do you need a new flu shot every year?
DODGED: What kind of expiriments would be suitable for testing and observing the PROCESS of evolution?
Molecular biology experiments. It's a thriving discipline. A related area, evolutionary developmental biology or evo-devo. Google them for yourself.
How were laws of nature established and set into motion in the complete absence of intelligence or deisgn?
And how are intelligence and design supposed to exist before there is any lawfulness to nature, numb-nuts?
The Creationists remind me of the "Seminar Callers" to radio programs. They ask the same questions over and over, learning nothing and forgetting nothing, without paying any attention to the answers.
To Chuggy-"You are a damned and damnable liar. I met this head on in post 1522. For a person unwilling to see a micron below the exposed surface, a quality you have not denied being true of you, the percentage of the Earth interior volume which can be said to have been explored is zero. Now rot in Hell."
Heehee That post was about cake, not about geological strata. Doh!
Nice answer. I guess I'll revert to the same tactic when I'm afraid to present the facts and figures.
I met this head on in post 1522.
No. You told a zero story about cake. You have yet to present a mathematical figure representing the percentage of the geologic record that has been exposed for scientific observation and analysis.
What you said about little rocks sinking faster than big rocks is wrong.
It was either you or your biddies who put those words in my mouth. What I said was smaller grains tend to sift down between larger ones. Try it in an experiment once. You'll see. Meanwhile, are we supposed to pretend Stoke's Law was the only operative factor in the formation of the earth as we know it?
Why do you need a new flu shot every year?
I don't. And even if I did it would no more be evidence of evolutionary advancement than the fact AIDs has developed to supplement other maladies effecting various populations. So?
Molecular biology experiments. It's a thriving discipline.
I'm sure it is, and I am sure it will progress very well on its own without the assistance of a million year "just-so story."
And how are intelligence and design supposed to exist before there is any lawfulness to nature . . .
Laws cannot function without either of those attributes, but on the part of the one who sets them in motion and the one who observes them.
Next!