Sorry pal, but predictions about "what will be found" are but worthless predicitions when the findings have been sitting around waiting to be "discovered" and analyzed according to what might have happened. It's the process, not the static record, that counts. Science hasn't watched evolution happen. Get it?
Shall I "predict" that, if I go to the bank I'll find money there and then call it "science" when I excercise my hypothesis? Gawd.
Sorry pal, but that's how science works. Or have you expanded the consipracy theory of science to include the connivence of inanimate matter?