Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: donh
What you just suggested, regarding the flood was that evidence you can't see would controvert the evidence of the geological column in the Grand Canyon.

That may be what you infer, but that is not what I said. I would fully expect all geological data to support the humanly recorded account of a world wide flood. The Grand Canyon is but a fraction of the geological data that resides untounched and unseen by humans. If you want to put all your stock in a tiny fraction of the data and make extrapolations concerning a PROCESS that has yet to be witnessed by human be my guest. In that case you have more faith than most Bible preachers.

1,241 posted on 12/03/2004 12:27:07 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1239 | View Replies ]


To: Fester Chugabrew
I would fully expect all geological data to support the humanly recorded account of a world wide flood.

The data do not support such a flood. One must thus assume the human recorders were mistaken.

1,243 posted on 12/03/2004 12:38:51 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson