Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Fester Chugabrew

So, basically what you are saying is that no observation in the fossil record would convince you that your idea is not correct. This again, therefore, is not a scientific theory. If I am wrong, then please tell me what observation would make you conclude that you are wrong.


1,216 posted on 12/03/2004 6:30:25 AM PST by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1155 | View Replies ]


To: stremba
So, basically what you are saying is that no observation in the fossil record would convince you that your idea is not correct.

The unfalsifiability factor applies to all parties concerned, since none were present to observe the fossil record as it was laid down. The plausibility factor weighs in favor of creationists because they have a written record handed down through history that attests to a catastrophic event that could very well have resulted in the creation of the fossil record.

1,217 posted on 12/03/2004 6:38:07 AM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1216 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson