Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Fester Chugabrew
I am assuming nothing. Evolution predicts that fossils sharing the characteristics of reptiles and mammals should exist, and they have been found. If you knew nothing of any creatures that existed, would you have predicted this? Probably not. It also predicts that creatures with the shared characteristics of birds and mammals should never be found. So far they haven't. I assume nothing, but when a theory makes predictions and these predictions hold true, for most people, it leads to increased confidence in that theory.
1,074 posted on 12/02/2004 6:45:46 AM PST by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1072 | View Replies ]


To: stremba
Evolution predicts that fossils sharing the characteristics of reptiles and mammals should exist, and they have been found.

Predicting that certain objects sharing similar characterics will be found is science? Hardly. For evolution theory to hold water it must predict and observe the process whereby those creatures derived from one another. Please do not mistake the observation of data with the process whereby the data emerged.

1,081 posted on 12/02/2004 7:10:37 AM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1074 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson