[4CJ]

Methinks that it is you who "just doesn't get it." Nobody here has fantasies of killing US troops. No US troops have fantasies of killing US citizens.

Bump. Where did any one of us allude to that perceived fantasy?????

In spite of all your nonsense regarding the killing of US troops and weak attempts to draw parallels between citizens acting in their sovereign capacity as outlined in the DOI and Constitution, you are the only one who has demonstrated hostility on these threads. It is you who venerate those who killed offensively, and not in defense of their homes and families. It is you who initiates vitriolic flame-wars and calls Americans terrorists, and it is you who is in conflict with credible historians.

Bump again. It's one thing to be CONSERVATIVE, another to blindy follow simply because of a political label. If one looks at the issues - limited government, lower taxes, self-defense, etc the Republican party of 1860 is not the party of President Reagan.

[#3Fan]

Bump again. It's one thing to be CONSERVATIVE, another to blindy follow simply because of a political label. If one looks at the issues - limited government, lower taxes, self-defense, etc the Republican party of 1860 is not the party of President Reagan.

The government was smaller, taxes were lower, and we punished those that attacked us. Looks like Lincoln was a fine Republican in the sense of Reagan to me.

[Gianni]

The conservative is the one who pulls the lever for the pro-choice, pro-gay marriage internationalist with the (R) next to thier name.

You, me, and thousands of Keyes/McClintock/Salier supporters will not be allowed knowledge of the secret republican handshake until we learn to toe the line.