To: 4ConservativeJustices
Bump again. It's one thing to be CONSERVATIVE, another to blindy follow simply because of a political label. If one looks at the issues - limited government, lower taxes, self-defense, etc the Republican party of 1860 is not the party of President Reagan.The government was smaller, taxes were lower, and we punished those that attacked us. Looks like Lincoln was a fine Republican in the sense of Reagan to me.
837 posted on
03/17/2004 9:27:23 AM PST by
#3Fan
(Kerry to POW-MIA activists: "You'll wish you'd never been born.". Link on my homepage.)
To: #3Fan; 4ConservativeJustices
The government was smaller, but Lincoln was hell bent on increasing its size.
taxes were lower, but Lincoln was hell bent on raising them.
we punished those that didn't like us.
840 posted on
03/17/2004 9:46:01 AM PST by
Gianni
(Sarcasm, the other white meat.)
To: #3Fan; 4ConservativeJustices
The government was smaller, but Lincoln was hell bent on increasing its size.
taxes were lower, but Lincoln was hell bent on raising them.
we punished those that didn't like us.
841 posted on
03/17/2004 9:46:02 AM PST by
Gianni
(Sarcasm, the other white meat.)
To: #3Fan; 4ConservativeJustices
The government was smaller, but Lincoln was hell bent on increasing its size.
taxes were lower, but Lincoln was hell bent on raising them.
we punished those that didn't like us.
842 posted on
03/17/2004 9:46:03 AM PST by
Gianni
(Sarcasm, the other white meat.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson