[beezdotcom]

Unlike Clinton, Rush admitted his short-comings and sought help.
Only after his "short-comings" were about to be exposed.

Right, whereas when Clinton's "short-comings" were about to be exposed, he merely quibbled over the definitions of the words "sexual relations" and "is".

[A2J]

Right, whereas when Clinton's "short-comings" were about to be exposed, he merely quibbled over the definitions of the words "sexual relations" and "is".

I agree that Clinton is a filthy piece of human debris and Rush is far from that, however, what bothers me is the incessant hypocrisy of conservatives to quickly (and correctly) attack liberals for unethical, immoral, or illegal activities, alleged or real, and yet give a free pass to one of their own when he/she dances to the same tune.