[A2J]

Right, whereas when Clinton's "short-comings" were about to be exposed, he merely quibbled over the definitions of the words "sexual relations" and "is".

I agree that Clinton is a filthy piece of human debris and Rush is far from that, however, what bothers me is the incessant hypocrisy of conservatives to quickly (and correctly) attack liberals for unethical, immoral, or illegal activities, alleged or real, and yet give a free pass to one of their own when he/she dances to the same tune.

[beezdotcom]

I agree that Clinton is a filthy piece of human debris and Rush is far from that, however, what bothers me is the incessant hypocrisy of conservatives to quickly (and correctly) attack liberals for unethical, immoral, or illegal activities, alleged or real, and yet give a free pass to one of their own when he/she dances to the same tune.

I'm not willing to give *anyone* a free pass, including the original poster who set up the strawman comparison between Limbaugh and Clinton.

Besides, it's a little unfair to complain about the conservatives not "policing their own", when to do so, they'll have to claw their way to the bottom of the big liberal pile-on, over an issue that most liberals have publicly claimed NOT to be an issue in other cases. If I saw my kid being swarmed by cops with billy-clubs for stealing a piece of candy, you can bet my first reaction wouldn't be "how DARE you steal candy?" (though it might be be second).