Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $23,006
28%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 28%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: gorsuchfilibuster

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Democrats Will Regret the Gorsuch Filibuster

    04/06/2017 2:15:41 PM PDT · by Kaslin · 26 replies
    Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | April 6, 2017 | Rush Limbaugh
    RUSH: I have to tell you, I didn’t think they’d actually do it. I didn’t think McConnell would actually do it. I thought when the moment of truth came, they’d find some out for not going nuclear. But they’re gonna do it. They’re gonna go nuclear, and the Democrats are running around acting like a bunch of stuck Trumps. Well, they think Trump’s a pig, so I just… Anyway, I’m gonna give you all the data on this that you need to understand what’s going on, because the Democrats are lying through their teeth about every aspect of this. BREAK...
  • Senate panel recommends Gorsuch for Supreme Court, Democrats hope to block nomination

    04/03/2017 1:25:34 PM PDT · by Enchante · 26 replies
    AP via Chicago Tribune ^ | April 3, 2017 | Mary Clare Jalonick Associated Press
    A deeply divided Senate panel favorably recommended Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch on Monday, sending the nomination to the full Senate for what is expected to be a partisan showdown — and eventual confirmation. The 11-9 committee vote for President Donald Trump's nominee, strictly along party lines, came shortly after Democrats secured enough votes to block the nomination in the full Senate. But that Democratic success was virtually certain to be a short-lived political victory, as Republicans vowed to change Senate rules to put Gorsuch on the court and score a much-needed win for their party.
  • Sen. Patrick Leahy won’t join Gorsuch filibuster

    03/27/2017 2:15:15 PM PDT · by Trump20162020 · 12 replies
    The Washington Times ^ | March 27, 2017 | Alex Swoyer
    The Senate’s most senior Democrat says he probably won’t join his party’s effort to filibuster Judge Neil Gorsuch, in the first major indication that Republicans may not have to resort to the so-called “nuclear option” to fill the empty Supreme Court seat. Senator Patrick Leahy, Vermont Democrat, said he’ll vote against Judge Gorsuch’s nomination, but doesn’t think a filibuster is the right path. “I am not inclined to filibuster, even though I’m not inclined to vote for him,” Leahy told the Vermont Digger on Sunday.
  • Dems Must Be Getting Bad Polling Numbers On Gorsuch Filibuster…

    03/27/2017 12:20:05 PM PDT · by EyesOfTX · 31 replies
    DB Daily Update ^ | 3.28.2017 | David Blackmon
    ...how else to explain this announcement from Vermont Senator Patrick Leahy, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee: “I am not inclined to filibuster, even though I’m not inclined to vote for him,” Leahy said. And please spare me any crap about Leahy’s respect for Senate tradition, his spirit of bi-partisanship, or any other nonsense like that. Leahy’s as partisan as partisan gets. This guy helped plan and execute the “high-tech lynching” of Clarence Thomas, for God’s sake.
  • James Comey is on the job, keeping everyone close and at a distance.

    03/24/2017 7:13:35 AM PDT · by pgkdan · 11 replies
    <p>So what we have is a call for nuclear proliferation, courtesy of Schemer Schumer himself. Go ahead, you’ll be doing both of us a favor, he might as well be saying to Mitch McConnell. Choose the nuclear option. And finish the deal Harry Reid started. As in most things dirty and political, they started it and now it’s up to the good guys to end it.</p>
  • Schumer promises Gorsuch filibuster, so McConnell, McCain, and Graham tease Reid's 'nuclear' option

    03/24/2017 10:17:06 AM PDT · by Sean_Anthony · 16 replies
    Canada Free Press ^ | 03/24/17 | Robert Laurie
    Whatever it takes. This is a knife fight for the future of the country Whether you like to refer to it as “The Nuclear Option,” the “rule change,” or “The Reid Option,” know this: Rumors of its usage for the Neil Gorsuch appointment are everywhere. You’ll recall that, back in January, Chuck Schumer said “If they don’t appoint somebody good, we’re going to oppose them tooth and nail.” Then, just a few sentences later, he admitted that there really was no judge that Trump would nominate who Democrats could back. He basically promised endless filibuster in a doomed effort to...
  • Filibuster Gorsuch, Please

    03/24/2017 4:01:06 AM PDT · by IBD editorial writer · 58 replies
    Investor's Business Daily ^ | 3/23/2017 | Staff
    Supreme Court: After Judge Neil Gorsuch spent 20 hours demonstrating that he is abundantly qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice, Democrats announced plans to filibuster his nomination. Good luck with that. By all accounts, Gorsuch put in a stellar performance in his confirmation hearing. Even the New York Times conceded that "if Democrats harbored any hope of raising doubts about Judge Gorsuch among Republicans, they came nowhere close." But as soon as the hearing ended, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer announced that he was going to filibuster the nomination anyway. Gorsuch, Schumer said, "was groomed by the Federalist Society...
  • Schumer: Democrats will filibuster Gorsuch nomination

    03/23/2017 8:11:43 AM PDT · by PghBaldy · 250 replies
    Washington Post ^ | March 23 | Ed O'Keefe, Robert Barnes and Ann E. Marimow
    As the Senate Judiciary Committee was hearing from witnesses for and against Judge Neil Gorsuch, his Supreme Court nomination was delivered a critical blow: Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said he would join with other Democrats in filibustering Gorsuch — a move that would require at least 60 senators to vote to end debate on the nomination.