Free Republic

Well, I think I might switch to RC Cola or to the Kroger brand cola sweetened with real sugar. I don’t really like Pepsi either, and I’m too White to drink Coke.

I bought my first Pepsi Cola in a store a couple weeks back. Not because I like Pepsi, or because I drink much soda-pop, but just to let Coca Cola know that I tried being less White, and it is just going to be way easier for me to switch my brand of Cola.

rlmorel,
So in real life you’re a badass who faces down your opponents, but on the internet you ask people to be respectful of your opinions, while you’re posting statements opposed to theirs?
I understand the desire for that, but it doesn’t evince strength, but a fear of being forcefully opposed even in cyberspace. With kind of seems counter to your other claim.
The way I see it you’re abetting fraud, and I can’t really find it in myself to respect that. I guess my point about my other internet contentions is that I already am being a lot more respectful of many who choose to be willfully ignorant on here,(not specifically you) than I ordinarily would be on forums that give more leeway for what is allowed to be said.
Trust me, I respect what I can and should, but I also am not afraid to oppose folks and oppose their beliefs, and even make enemies of them if they so choose.

Most Conservatives are mentally poorly equipped to win.
https://www.rooshv.com/conservatives-are-losers
That article sort of gives a general description of why the rabid Left have always kicked the butt of the “nice” Conservatives, in maters of culture and politics. They stole the election and we just politely grab our ankles until further notice. They post altered video as reality, and we make excuses for them. LOL That isn’t a winning mindset.

I do believe that is the most embarrassing thing I’ve seen a President do. Did you ever see George H. W. Bush vomit and faint into the lap of the Japanese Prime minister. That's hard to top. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_KVL-wtpgg

rlmorel,
No, my comment wasn’t directed at you specifically. I was speaking in generalities. Some on here still claim the video is authentic and somehow “digital compression” added all the fakery into it. LOL
I think it might be the swamp/Lefties gaslighting us to doubt our own eyes when we see their obvious fakery just like with the election fraud.

I haven’t been on Free Republic in quite a while. I’ve been elsewhere battling on the rough & tumble internet.
Please don’t expect me to be soothing your feelings, you will be disappointed. I’m not your emotional support animal.

don't be silly folks. Of course you can film against a green screen backdrop from multiple angles. They do it all the time. You film the same action with multiple cameras at specific angles, and then you set up your cameras again at similar angles elsewhere and film your backdrop. And maybe then you put some stuff moving in the foreground(like microphones) to make it seem to simpletons, like there is too much live action going on to be a composited video. I have only seen video from two angles, meaning only two cameras may have been used. Which would be pretty simple to edit. They really should have done a better job. Also there could have been more camera angles and it still be a green screen composite shot. By some of your logic Gollum must be a real creature because there are scenes where he is shown from multiple angles. LOL And that was done a long time ago. The CGI really can be done better now, but wasn't. It alarms me that there are so many people here that want to push us to trust an obviously fake video. There seems to be some type of mental conditioning being performed on us, not just sloppy faked propaganda being issued as truth. Lots of unnecessary gaslighting. e.g. I'm immortal, and in the film industry, and I have been filming green screen for 150 years and I can assure you that is not a composited image. Trust me, I have been doing this longer than you have. /S LOL They're currently trying to get you to distrust your eyes and believe a sloppily composited video of president Gollum. It certainly could have been shot simultaneously from multiple angles and still be a composited shot. They might even be doing this as some sort of propaganda or mental conditioning exercise. The point is we need to investigate this further, not screech that it is a conspiracy and that the mismatches between the two video angles don't matter, because sometimes conspiracy theorists are wrong. Clearly Americans were fed poorly doctored videos for some reason.

I haven’t posted or commented much here in the last decade. I had no idea Free-Republic had become firm believers in the integrity of our main stream media and the Democrat party. LOL Faith in our media was declining back when I left. I guess they must have really cleaned up their act while I wasn’t paying attention. /S

If you watch the YouTube clip where Biden appears to walk towards the helicopter. pause the video, and you’ll see an aura of blurry grass right around Joe, especially between his legs. Plus Joe is strongly top-lit making his hair glow on top of his head, except when the top of his head gets so white that it is auto-cropped out and is replaced with the grey sky from the background, however he still has no shadow,(like Peter Pan) despite how bright the studio light is shining down on him, while the helicopter clearly has a noticeable shadow. Hmmm, interesting.

With a mask covering his face, the puppeteers can make him say whatever they want.

A YouTube commenter said:
“They know that its obviously fake. They don’t care. Their message is : we’re going to lie in your face, you’re going to like it and there is nothing you can do about it.”

If you watch the video clips from both angles, it becomes obvious that the microphones and Joe Biden were not both there together. As Joe walks towards the helicopter he has no shadow, but the helicopter has a plainly visible shadow. It also seems like they were careful not to have Joe's feet quite in the frame for most of the time. A Trick to make the illusion easier work for them.

Trump basically told them, See you losers in our 6 to 3 supreme court. LOL

I believe innocent until proven guilty is a biblical principle. And a single person claiming something happened is not proof. It takes 2 or 3 witnesses to corroborate any single event. In Moore’s case even though you’ve got multiple paid witnesses, I don’t believe any claimed incident has more than one “witness”. Thus they are all likely just made up lies. If you have multiple witnesses to the same event, they can be cross examined separately to see if their stories hold together. Nobody should be punished based solely on an unproven accusation.

Deuteronomy 19
15 One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established.

16 If a false witness rise up against any man to testify against him that which is wrong;

17 Then both the men, between whom the controversy is, shall stand before the Lord, before the priests and the judges, which shall be in those days;

18 And the judges shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, if the witness be a false witness, and hath testified falsely against his brother;

19 Then shall ye do unto him, as he had thought to have done unto his brother: so shalt thou put the evil away from among you.

20 And those which remain shall hear, and fear, and shall henceforth commit no more any such evil among you.

All I want is the repeal part anyhow. I’d prefer going “forward” to getting what you pay for. Capitalized Medicine. Let market forces increase competition, drive down prices, and spur innovative new cures.

“I’m definitely for making an example of a suspected leaker whether or not we have any real basis for it,” - John Podesta

“If that fucking bastard wins, we all hang from nooses!” - Hillary Clinton

I actually worked on contract around this guy at the Hawker Beechcraft's Wichita Service Center for a month this fall. I used to get things out of the very cabinets shown behind him in the picture. He was an Avionics lead guy on second shift. He would come in about 45 minutes before I would leave each day. I didn't talk with him very much directly, but I often overheard him interacting with others. The company was recently bankrupted by its moronic management, and most of the competent people had been forced to flee the place earlier. Morale was very bad amongst the remaining employees and management was a perfect "how not to do things" example. Terry, however, was different. He seemed to be one of the few people who actually was mentally well prepared to do his job, he actually knew what was going on and why and was technically competent. The other guys on his shift seemed to turn to him for guidance, while most of the supervisory folks were "lost" as to what should be going on. Oddly he seemed to be the only guy in the whole place who seemed to be happy to come into work each day, and seemed to act as though he had a "purpose" in coming to work besides just getting a paycheck. If the purported time-line is correct, he was already happily planning to blow the place to hell when I was seeing him there. I guess the lesson I take away from that is: Anybody at Hawker Beechcraft who is happy to be there is likely just a psychopath excited by the prospect of how they'll soon extract deadly retribution on the world. If I had stayed there longer than a month, I'm sure I would have gotten to know him better. I've got a call in to a friend who still works there to try to find out more.

Maybe Obama should get an Oscar to go alongside his Nobel Prize.

A great video and a good historical reminder. I hope this gets a lot of exposure. He presents his reasons for decision quite well. It made me proud to be a republican, and I don’t often feel proud of the party.