Replies

don't be silly folks. Of course you can film against a green screen backdrop from multiple angles. They do it all the time. You film the same action with multiple cameras at specific angles, and then you set up your cameras again at similar angles elsewhere and film your backdrop. And maybe then you put some stuff moving in the foreground(like microphones) to make it seem to simpletons, like there is too much live action going on to be a composited video. I have only seen video from two angles, meaning only two cameras may have been used. Which would be pretty simple to edit. They really should have done a better job. Also there could have been more camera angles and it still be a green screen composite shot. By some of your logic Gollum must be a real creature because there are scenes where he is shown from multiple angles. LOL And that was done a long time ago. The CGI really can be done better now, but wasn't. It alarms me that there are so many people here that want to push us to trust an obviously fake video. There seems to be some type of mental conditioning being performed on us, not just sloppy faked propaganda being issued as truth. Lots of unnecessary gaslighting. e.g. I'm immortal, and in the film industry, and I have been filming green screen for 150 years and I can assure you that is not a composited image. Trust me, I have been doing this longer than you have. /S LOL They're currently trying to get you to distrust your eyes and believe a sloppily composited video of president Gollum. It certainly could have been shot simultaneously from multiple angles and still be a composited shot. They might even be doing this as some sort of propaganda or mental conditioning exercise. The point is we need to investigate this further, not screech that it is a conspiracy and that the mismatches between the two video angles don't matter, because sometimes conspiracy theorists are wrong. Clearly Americans were fed poorly doctored videos for some reason.

"...Lots of unnecessary gaslighting. e.g. I'm immortal, and in the film industry, and I have been filming green screen for 150 years and I can assure you that is not a composited image. Trust me, I have been doing this longer than you have..."

Yes. That is about as snotty, scummy and uncivil as accusing people of being Leftist plants because they might disagree on a rational basis.

I assume your post was directed at me. If you were speaking generally, you can specify.

Please show me where I screeched this was a conspiracy theory. I did nothing of the sort.

Secondly, I specifically stated “...so even if I haven’t been doing much of it lately, I do have some knowledge of it...” which is a far cry from “trust me I know more than you”.

I also specifically stated that the images were altered and did not dispute that.

Lastly, if your comment about “gaslighting” was directed at me, you should open a dictionary and review the definition of gaslighting, which is generally defined as an attempt to to cause (a person) to doubt his or her sanity through the use of psychological manipulation.

Disagreeing on an issue might make someone wrong, as I or anyone else could be, but is not gaslighting. And “gaslighting” is a serious issue today. Using it as a catch-all phrase waters it down until it won’t mean anything.

In this case, it is clear the video was edited. We don’t know how. We don’t know why. And we don’t know by whom.

But because people discuss those things and have different opinions that may or may not be right or wrong is no reason for people to engage in ad hominem attack as his happening here on this forum.