Free Republic 4th Quarter Fundraising Target: $88,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $18,014
20%  
Woo hoo!! And the first 20% is in!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Posts by justiceseeker93

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Did Raiders Throw NFL Game Over Anthem?

    10/03/2017 1:14:05 PM PDT · 46 of 48
    justiceseeker93 to maggief; henkster; BluesDuke; ml/nj; okie01; shortstop; clintonh8r; Mr. K; alloysteel; ptsal; ...
    Regardless of the reason, and whatever you think of the "taking a knee" upon the playing of the Star-Spangled Banner, no legitimate sports organization on any level can tolerate any player deliberately not giving his maximum effort toward attempting to win the game in which he is participating. The only possible penalty for any such player should be suspension for life. As an amateur sports historian, I know that there have been instances of athletes "taking dives" in professional baseball (the Black Sox scandal), professional and college basketball, and college football. All of these that I know of, incidentally, were fixes involving gamblers.

    As far as professional football is concerned, the closest thing to to this I can recall (but far less egregious) was players admitting to betting on their OWN teams. Their penalty was a one-year suspension.

    Having watched most of the first half of the Raiders vs. Redskins game in question here, it occurred to me at the time that the Raiders' offensive performance was dreadful, especially considering that they were believed to have a potent and explosive offense which had scored 45 points the prior week. I know they were shut out in that first half and had very few first downs.

    Other sports have shown zero tolerance of players who deliberately gave less than their best. The NFL, if wants to be on the level and is concerned about the basic integrity of its game on the field, must do a complete investigation of this Raiders-Redskins game, including thorough study of the game film. And anyone found taking a dive - regardless of the "reason" - should be banned from the league for life. Any thing less would be condoning consumer fraud.

    BTW, were any suspicions along these lines reported by the MSM?

  • Summary of Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson Amendment [obamacare modification]

    09/22/2017 5:37:30 PM PDT · 31 of 33
    justiceseeker93 to SunkenCiv; nikos1121; Ravi; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; nolongerademocrat; LucyT; All
    Correctionto my previous post:

    It has already leaked out that Kimmel’s rant on Graham-Cassidy was stage-managed in advance by none other than CHUCKIE SCHUMER! How's that for collusion? Schumer was merely using Kimmel as a mouthpiece for Dummycrat talking points!

  • Summary of Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson Amendment [obamacare modification]

    09/22/2017 5:32:36 PM PDT · 30 of 33
    justiceseeker93 to SunkenCiv; nikos1121; Ravi; Yaelle; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; LucyT; All
    I has already leaked out that Kimmel’s rant on Graham-Cassidy was stage-managed in advance by none other than CHUCKIE SCHUMER! How's that for collusion? Schumer was merely using Kimmel as a mouthpiece for Dummycrat talking points!
  • Petition to the White House to Have the Federal Government Re-investigate the Vincent Foster Death

    09/21/2017 8:06:32 AM PDT · 53 of 56
    justiceseeker93 to Yaelle; AJFavish; gaijin; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; firebrand; exit82; doug from upland; ...
    I believe that if impartial investigators and law enforcement had done their job back when Foster was killed, Clinton would have been removed from office and perhaps his wife would have served time. Anyone associated with the Clintons would have been tarnished and slunk away from the halls of power. There would never have been a President Obama.

    There would still be corruption today, but I believe we would still be a constitutional republic. The swamp really did follow the broken window theory. As more and more corruption was allowed by the powers that be who control the media, the more the public became gullible and unable to see the bizarro world today for what it is. Up is down, wrong is right.

    Great comment, Yaelle! Couldn't agree more.

  • Petition to the White House to Have the Federal Government Re-investigate the Vincent Foster Death

    09/20/2017 2:39:21 PM PDT · 51 of 56
    justiceseeker93 to Tennessee Nana; AJFavish; ExTexasRedhead; Yaelle; firebrand; juliej
    he shot himself in the back of the head 3 times and then threw the gun away and lay down and died...

    I would be commenting "LOL!" but homicide is a very serious matter. And this was almost surely a homicide conspiracy.

    Once you come to that conclusion, it would follow that the Clintons, at a minimum, gave the murder plot their blessing. If that were not the case, you can bet the farm that there would have been arrests and criminal charges against a perp or perps (much more likely plural) within a short time frame after the death.

    Instead, there occurred a multi-faceted government cover-up rather than an objective government investigation.

    Unfortunately, the Foster homicide case has for 24 years been the taboo of all taboos as far as the unwillingness for government to disclose the truth is concerned.

  • I’m Glad the Dyke March Banned Jewish Stars

    07/01/2017 8:49:45 AM PDT · 27 of 29
    justiceseeker93 to SJackson; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; Yaelle; Kaslin; faithhopecharity; left that other site; ...
    It's a bit shocking that they call it a "Dyke March." I would think that the word "dyke" would be considered an insult to that bunch, but apparently not.

    BTW, what the heck are they marching FOR? What issues do they want to bring to the public's awareness that we aren't aware of already? Their psychiatric pathology?

    From this Jewish perspective, seeing the Star of David in this parade of sleaze is an embarrassment.

  • ‘Very Sensitive’ Film on Anti-Semitic Attacks by Muslims on Europe’s Jews Shelved [tr]

    06/14/2017 5:36:04 PM PDT · 16 of 24
    justiceseeker93 to C19fan; Eleutheria5; MadMax, the Grinning Reaper; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; IsraelBeach; ...
    It's clear that the "very sensitive" label attached to this documentary is just a cover-up for the real reasons that it is being censored from the airways:

    (1) There has been such a great influx of Muslims to Germany and France that their Muslim populations far outnumber their Jewish and pro-Jewish Christian populations combined. So for the uncaring political classes in these countries, the instinctive politically-correct, no-brainer thing to do is to favor Islamic interests at the expense of Jewish concerns. There are more votes for them doing that than acting humanely and morally, and less chance of violent resistance.

    (2) Underlying this government policy-making is that electronic media in western Europe is controlled by the state; without passing state censorship, no work, no matter its artistic and moral value, can reach the airwaves so that the masses can be informed on certain political and social issues in their respective countries.

  • Alex Jones Unleashes Bizarre Rant Against Megyn Kelly: ‘Cold. Robotic. Dead.’

    06/10/2017 4:41:40 PM PDT · 88 of 92
    justiceseeker93 to All
    Correction to my post # 83:

    Should be:

    (1) Her narcissistic penchant for plastic surgery, on which she is reputed to have spent somewhere around 1.4 million dollars.

    (Sorry to have left out the decimal point.)

  • Great Britain: Live Election Results

    06/10/2017 11:40:10 AM PDT · 298 of 327
    justiceseeker93 to DoughtyOne; All
    Brexit was sure to become the referendum issue of the day.

    Do you think that the two recent terrorist incidents in Britain worked against the incumbent party?

  • Alex Jones Unleashes Bizarre Rant Against Megyn Kelly: ‘Cold. Robotic. Dead.’

    06/10/2017 11:33:19 AM PDT · 83 of 92
    justiceseeker93 to EveningStar; Nifster; hoosiermama; LucyT; SatinDoll; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; Sarah Barracuda; ...
    Did anyone happen to see the recent National Enquirer hit piece on Megyn Kelly? Judging from the Kelly seen on the screen when at FOX (I don't watch the Peacock Network), I would say that the facts presented in the article are, for the most part, accurate.

    The article discusses:

    (1) Her narcissistic penchant for plastic surgery, on which she is reputed to have spent somewhere around 14 million dollars. (Yes, her face has changed dramatically over the years she has been on TV.)

    (2) Her problems as a teenager, including underage drinking and shoplifting.

    (3) Her divorce from her first husband (from other sources, a Chicago psychiatrist), whom she wanted to be a "wife" and do customary "wifely" household chores, like cooking and cleaning. (Apart from the article, it has been reported that she ran away from her husband and her lucrative position in a Chicago law firm and went to Washington seeking a career change.)

    (4) Her Type A, alpha female, personality, i. e., she's bitchy.

    (5) Her hatred for Donald Trump, supposed to be based on some negative comments Trump made about her lack of professionalism as a journalist. (Remember, though, that Kelly started her run-in with Trump, when, as moderator of a couple of GOP primary debates, she asked him some snarky "gotcha" questions and made derisive comments about Trump's views on women.)

  • Great Britain: Live Election Results

    06/08/2017 6:08:23 PM PDT · 31 of 327
    justiceseeker93 to NRx; ml/nj; TexasGator; DoughtyOne; LucyT; Political Junkie Too; SunkenCiv; Impy; InterceptPoint; ..
    As an American, this is the first time I've ever seen British election results being covered on British TV live, in this case on SkyNews (which is owned, IIRC, by the Murdoch family).

    One thing jumps out at me immediately: the anchors are cheerleading for the leftist parties! Reminds me of how just about all the "mainstream" American networks (with the possible exception of a few reporters on FOX) do the same for the Dummycrats on election night here.

  • Bernie Sanders, Self-Hating Jew, Blasts Israeli "Occupation"

    06/07/2017 6:03:22 AM PDT · 35 of 43
    justiceseeker93 to MadMax, the Grinning Reaper; Eleutheria5; All
    The only good thing about this Sanders video was that it was addressed only to Meretz, the ultraleft Israeli partiy which has only a tiny minority in the Israeli parliament.

    The reason is obvious: Sanders knew that if he tried to speak to the Israeli people as a whole, he would be ripped apart - and rightfully so - by a large majority of the Knesset and by the Israeli government.

  • Bernie Sanders, Self-Hating Jew, Blasts Israeli "Occupation"

    06/06/2017 6:26:20 PM PDT · 15 of 43
    justiceseeker93 to ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; Yehuda; Sarah Barracuda; jazminerose; Amerisrael; Eleutheria5; ...
    Ping!!!

    Kudos to Mark Levin, who played the Sanders speech on his national radio show tonight and ripped into him, appropriately calling Sanders a communist.

  • Bernie Sanders, Self-Hating Jew, Blasts Israeli "Occupation"

    06/06/2017 5:50:23 PM PDT · 1 of 43
    justiceseeker93
    You may need some medication to prevent vomiting, but the full video of Sanders' remarks to the ultraleft Israeli Meretz party is available on the Daily Wire web site.
  • Top New York Democrats decry Trump for embassy delay

    06/05/2017 12:46:07 PM PDT · 26 of 28
    justiceseeker93 to ColdOne; DoughtyOne; montag813; MadMax, the Grinning Reaper; sheik yerbouty; SJackson; firebrand; ..
    Chuck Schumer, the highest-ranking Democrat in the Senate, and Eliot Engel, ranking member of the House Foreign Relations Committee, both issued condemnatory statements after the White House temporarily waived a congressional requirement compelling the embassy move.

    This story is just Chuckie (and, in this case, his sidekick Engel) trying to recoup some of the 'Rats losses in the pro-Israel community which were incurred as a result of Trump's successful trip. Apparently Schumer became somewhat miffed at having to play second fiddle to Trump in terms of media attention, and so called up some buddy at the left-leaning Jerusalem Post who was more than happy to give him a story to retaliate against Trump.

    It should be noted that the vast majority of Israelis had no trouble with the waiver of the embassy move.

    Then too, as mentioned by other posters here, Chuckie Schumer never criticized Obama or Clinton for their waivers of the embassy move. And it seems highly improbable that he will condemn fellow Democrats in Congress for participating in blatantly anti-Israel activities.

    As for Engel, his main claim to fame was leading a celebration on the Capitol lawn directly following the House votes to impeach Bill Clinton. (Yes, the Democrats in the House actually threw a party (no pun intended) on the lawn outside the Capitol building to celebrate their president's impeachment.)

  • This woman called a cat unprintable names. Now everybody wants to adopt him. (Aussie Cat Rescue)

    06/04/2017 3:41:19 PM PDT · 42 of 45
    justiceseeker93 to Seizethecarp; Yaelle; LucyT; Slings and Arrows; All
    I'm thinking that Mr. Biggles' behavior might become more socially acceptable if he were neutered (assuming he hasn't been neutered already).

    Could be some prejudice against BLACK cats motivating this Australian lady's critique of him. I never understood the logic behind the fear of black cats.

  • This woman called a cat unprintable names. Now everybody wants to adopt him. (Aussie Cat Rescue)

    06/04/2017 1:18:27 PM PDT · 39 of 45
    justiceseeker93 to Seizethecarp; Yaelle; LucyT; Slings and Arrows; All
    I'm thinking that Mr. Biggles' behavior might become more socially acceptable if he were neutered (assuming he hasn't been neutered already).

    Could be some prejudice against BLACK cats motivating this Australian lady's critique of him. I never understood the logic behind the fear of black cats.

  • Democratic Rep. Mark Pocan Identified as Lawmaker Behind Anti-Israel Capitol Hill Forum

    06/04/2017 1:03:41 PM PDT · 15 of 18
    justiceseeker93 to Nifster; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; firebrand; TexasGator; LucyT; Sean Hannity; holdonnow; dfwgator; ...
    Wonder what the Capitol Police think about this?

    Does Pocan have the prerogative to invite anyone he wants to come on the Capitol grounds, despite their pro-terrorist sympathies and backgrounds? Or do these forum speakers have to be vetted by law enforcement as a precondition to gaining entry to the premises?

    Seems like there are already quite a number of Islamic extremists making a place for themselves on Capitol hill as staffers for predominantly Democrat members.

  • Democratic Rep. Mark Pocan Identified as Lawmaker Behind Anti-Israel Capitol Hill Forum

    06/04/2017 9:26:40 AM PDT · 12 of 18
    justiceseeker93 to All
    Correction to my post #9:

    I'm sure the Islamists who pretend to be buddies with Pocan would cut off his his head when they have no use for him anymore.

  • Democratic Rep. Mark Pocan Identified as Lawmaker Behind Anti-Israel Capitol Hill Forum

    06/04/2017 9:07:24 AM PDT · 9 of 18
    justiceseeker93 to montag813
    On November 24, 2006, Pocan and his long-term partner, Philip Frank, were legally married in Toronto, Ontario.[14]

    Yes, I knew about that, having looked up his background yesterday.

    I'm sure the Islamists pretends to be buddies with would cut off his head when they have no use for him anymore.