“FR is a conservative site that is AGAINST homosexualism.”
How did you come to this conclusion? I would submit that there are more than a few libertarians that don’t really care one way or another on the subject (and yes, I know that the founder is supposed to be an opponent of the gay-agenda, but he is an opponent of many other agendas as well). In any event, FR is now greater than the sum of its parts. In addition, simply being conservative does not mean one is a religious conservative.
There are all sorts of flavors of conservatism, and if FR was populated by only religious conservatives it would be a pale representation of what it is now. You may wish that FR was otherwise, but the Conservative cause (which the anti-gay agenda is only a subset in the religious category), has greater challenges than concerning themselves with whatever the gay-agenda du jour is at the moment.
In the end, “boresighting” homosexuals will not save the Republic when full blown Marxism is in the political winds. It’s time that the homophobes, whether religious or otherwise, improved their situational awareness.
If the Log Cabin Republicans will assist in derailing the Obamites, I couldn’t care less about their sexual preferences.